30.10.2012 Views

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MariaJesus Luengo and Maria Obeso<br />

And as result, the final model is represented in Figure 1, where we can see the correlation value<br />

between the constructs.In this sense, we identify a moderate correlation (around 0,48) between use<br />

extern sources <strong>for</strong> innovation activities and the economic impact of innovations in turnover.<br />

Figure 1: Equation structural relation between economic impact of innovations in turnover and Extern<br />

sources <strong>for</strong> innovation activities<br />

4.3 Phase 2: Structural model<br />

In this section, we recognize the measures of global adjustment in order to identify how the model<br />

predicts the initial data matrix. This adjustment will be perfect when there was a perfect<br />

correspondence between the matrix reproduced by the model and the matrix of observations. For this,<br />

we propose absolute measures of fit in order to evaluate the goodness of fit considering sample size<br />

and number of indicators (Schumacker and Lomax, 2004). Meanwhile incremental adjustment<br />

measures or descriptive are based on model comparison, and they compare proposed model with the<br />

worst model. In this sense, this offers in<strong>for</strong>mation about the degree of reality of the model. Finally,<br />

parsimony adjustment measures is the degree to which the model fit achieve the adjustment <strong>for</strong> each<br />

estimated coefficient. Table 6 contains the indicators and their recommend values.<br />

Table 6: Global adjustment indexes<br />

Index Measure Shorthand Acceptable fit<br />

Absolute<br />

Chi-square<br />

≤ 5<br />

adjustment Root Mean Square Error of Approximation RMSEA < 0,06<br />

<strong>Standard</strong>ized Root Mean Squared Residuals SRMR ≤ 0,08<br />

Goodness of fit index GFI ≥ 0,95; ≤ 1<br />

Incremental<br />

Non-Normed Fit Index NNFI ≥ 0,97; ≤ 1<br />

adjustment<br />

Normed Fit Index NFI ≥ 0,95; ≤ 1<br />

Relative Fit Index RFI ≥ 0,90<br />

Comparative Fit Index CFI ≥ 0,97; ≤ 1<br />

Incremental Fit Index IFI ≥ 0,90<br />

Parsimony<br />

Parsimony adjusted-NFI PNFI Next to 1<br />

adjustment<br />

Parsimony adjusted-CFI PCFI Next to 1<br />

Minimum value of the discrepancy/Degrees of Freedom CMIN/DF ≥ 1; ≤ 5<br />

Hoelter critical N in the output path <strong>for</strong> α = 0,01 Holter.01 ≥ 200<br />

The model is recursive and it has five items <strong>for</strong> two endogenous constructs (dimensions). Degrees of<br />

freedom are four and the number of estimate parameters is sixteen. In general, the model presents<br />

good fits, with exception of two parsimony indicators (see Table 7).<br />

4.4 Results<br />

First model presents a loading factor more than 1 <strong>for</strong> INFCLIEN variable;there<strong>for</strong>e it has been<br />

excluded as explanatory variable in INFEX construct. As consequently, we cannot verify or refute<br />

hypothesis 1. Like customer´s in<strong>for</strong>mation is very important <strong>for</strong> organizations (Chesbrough, 2003;<br />

Laursen and Salter, 2006; Lichtenthaler, 2008), this variable and its impact in innovation results<br />

should be analyze alone in future researches.<br />

452

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!