30.10.2012 Views

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Laura Galloway, Isla Kapasi and Geoff Whittam<br />

In the original study, students who had just completed an entrepreneurship module as part of their<br />

degree were asked to complete a questionnaire. The entrepreneurship modules were all elective<br />

classes in one of four universities. The modules included in the survey were of two types: one was<br />

applied business venturing, where students participated in a business start-up simulation in teams of<br />

4 or 5; the other type was ‘about entrepreneurship’ in which the objectives focused on learning what<br />

entrepreneurship and enterprise are, and the value of them and the small firms sector to economies<br />

and competitiveness. Previous studies using the original data found no significant differences in<br />

attitudes or ambitions of students between module types (Galloway, et al., 2005), and in most cases,<br />

since both types were available in all the participating universities, students attended both during their<br />

degree programmes. Where both types had been taken, one response per student was included in<br />

the survey analysis and this varied depending on the order in which students took the modules,<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e both types were represented without bias.<br />

The current study follows up with participants from two of these four institutions. A sample of 600<br />

participants completed the original questionnaire in 2005 or 2006, and so the current study sought to<br />

follow up on them six or seven years since they received one of the entrepreneurship classes.<br />

In the original study, personal email and telephone numbers were gathered, and this was the means<br />

by which participants were contacted <strong>for</strong> the follow-up. However, as is characteristic of students, once<br />

graduated, lives move on and they become hard to find. Contact details change as lives develop.<br />

Other means by which the study sought to ‘find’ those from the original was by using social network<br />

sites such as Facebook and Linkedin there<strong>for</strong>e. Despite the plethora of communications and<br />

networking mechanisms facilitated by the internet and other technologies, it proved extremely difficult<br />

to source participants. Ultimately, while several participants were found, the number of them was low,<br />

and amongst them only ten agreed to be interviewed. However, while originally disappointing, the low<br />

number did make possible interviews and inspection at some depth to follow-up on the stories of<br />

these participants. Ultimately, this proved beneficial to the research.<br />

In the original study, as per Table 1 above, each participant was given a score in terms of how<br />

entrepreneurial he or she was. Table 2 below provides details of the ten participants of the follow-up<br />

study, including their original entrepreneurship score. Each in<strong>for</strong>mant participated in a semi structured<br />

interview, in which they were asked to broadly outline their experience so far in their career, their<br />

ambitions <strong>for</strong> the future, and the extent to which they considered entrepreneurship education had<br />

impacted or been useful (or not) in their careers. The limited number of questions was intended to<br />

allow <strong>for</strong> as much conversation as possible, facilitate rapport and through that, allow participants to<br />

respond as openly as possible.<br />

Table 2: The interview participants<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mant Score in Original Study (0- Entrepreneur or nor entrepreneur<br />

4)<br />

(BO or SE)<br />

A 3 entrepreneur<br />

B 3 entrepreneur<br />

C 3 student<br />

D 2 entrepreneur<br />

E 1 employed<br />

F 1 employed<br />

G 2 entrepreneur<br />

H 1 entrepreneur (franchisee)<br />

I 2 doing a PhD<br />

J 0 employed and entrepreneur<br />

5. Results<br />

Two interviewees who had a high score in the original survey are now ‘entrepreneurs’ and both<br />

established their businesses within two years of finishing their degree. In fact one of the interviewees<br />

was establishing their business whilst still finishing their degree. Both had a positive experience of<br />

their entrepreneurial experience at university. For example, interviewee ‘A’ stated<br />

“I think entrepreneurship module is very important part of what the University offers. It enables the<br />

students to understand the value of innovation, marketing and gives confidence in setting up their own<br />

business...Learning about the business plan during the entrepreneurship course was useful. It made<br />

256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!