2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

Recommendations

Info

126 A BSOLUTE( S ) SPIELEN myths”. Herbert Simon’s work is a good example: he recently extended cognitive science’s concepts and methods to literary criticism in the effort to provide a “solid foundation” to the latter discipline. Unsurprisingly, one of the results of his analysis is that literary criticism has to be considered a branch of cognitive science. Accordingly with the plan just sketched, in the next chapter I willprovide an analysis of non-philosophy and see how the two target disciplines mentioned above fit in that category.
CHAPTER III PHILOSOPHY, NON-PHILOSOPHY, AND SCIENCE in which a new category, non-philosophy, comes to join the familiar distinction between science and philosophy, and why Artificial Intelligence and Structuralism belong to it.
Page 1 and 2:
ENDGAMES Game and Play at the End o
Page 3 and 4:
I. Prelude 1. Mr. Palomar 3 2. Mr.
Page 5 and 6:
PRELUDE
Page 7 and 8:
M R . PALOMAR will make clear, hope
Page 9 and 10:
M R . PALOMAR’ S CHECKMATES I wil
Page 11 and 12:
M R . PALOMAR’ S CHECKMATES Conce
Page 13 and 14:
M R . PALOMAR’ S CHECKMATES “sh
Page 15 and 16:
M R . PALOMAR’ S CHECKMATES after
Page 17 and 18:
T HE WORLD OF CANDRAKIRTI we have s
Page 19 and 20:
T HE WORLD OF CANDRAKIRTI in a manu
Page 21 and 22:
T HE WORLD OF CANDRAKIRTI securing
Page 23 and 24:
T HE WORLD OF CANDRAKIRTI and combi
Page 25 and 26:
tion: T HE WORLD OF CANDRAKIRTI 1.
Page 27 and 28:
T HE WORLD OF CANDRAKIRTI interpret
Page 29 and 30:
T HE WORLD OF CANDRAKIRTI biguity,
Page 31 and 32:
T HE IRREPARABLE LIGHT OF DAWN the
Page 33 and 34:
T HE IRREPARABLE LIGHT OF DAWN In M
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER I THE END OF PHILOSOPHY in
Page 37 and 38:
2. Philosophy P HILOSOPHY Discourse
Page 39 and 40:
P HILOSOPHY cably intertwined that
Page 41 and 42:
P HILOSOPHY As this passage shows,
Page 43 and 44:
H EGEL’ S PARADOX inner contradic
Page 45 and 46:
H EGEL’ S PARADOX for better or f
Page 47 and 48:
H EGEL’ S PARADOX a series of eve
Page 49 and 50:
H EGEL’ S PARADOX Let us go back
Page 51 and 52:
H EGEL’ S PARADOX then I am clear
Page 53 and 54:
H EGEL’ S PARADOX opened up for u
Page 55 and 56:
P HILOSOPHY’ S ENDS Therefore, ou
Page 57 and 58:
P HILOSOPHY’ S ENDS Western tradi
Page 59 and 60:
P HILOSOPHY’ S ENDS goes, has chi
Page 61 and 62:
P HILOSOPHY’ S ENDS his argument.
Page 63 and 64:
P HILOSOPHY’ S ENDS sented as sep
Page 65 and 66:
P HILOSOPHY’ S ENDS The first opt
Page 67 and 68:
P HILOSOPHY’ S ENDS to philosophy
Page 69 and 70:
P HILOSOPHY’ S ENDS This multipli
Page 71 and 72:
O F LINES, CIRCLES, AND SPHERES. co
Page 73 and 74:
O F LINES, CIRCLES, AND SPHERES. 12
Page 75 and 76:
O F LINES, CIRCLES, AND SPHERES. on
Page 77 and 78:
“EIN SPIELEN DER LIEBE MIT SICH S
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84: “EIN SPIELEN DER LIEBE MIT SICH S
Page 85 and 86: “EIN SPIELEN DER LIEBE MIT SICH S
Page 87 and 88: CHAPTER II ABSOLUTE(S) SPIELEN in w
Page 89 and 90: “ TO DIE GAME” Spiel is actuall
Page 91 and 92: “ TO DIE GAME” context of a “
Page 93 and 94: “ TO DIE GAME” tion that is the
Page 95 and 96: A BSOLUTE( S ) SPIELEN tragic: this
Page 97 and 98: A BSOLUTE( S ) SPIELEN the player m
Page 99 and 100: A BSOLUTE( S ) SPIELEN Hegel is the
Page 101 and 102: A BSOLUTE( S ) SPIELEN tation, woul
Page 103 and 104: A BSOLUTE( S ) SPIELEN the roots of
Page 105 and 106: B ORDERING PHILOSOPHY holds itself
Page 107 and 108: B ORDERING PHILOSOPHY informal expl
Page 109 and 110: B ORDERING PHILOSOPHY ditions that
Page 111 and 112: B ORDERING PHILOSOPHY inside the bu
Page 113 and 114: B ORDERING PHILOSOPHY The existence
Page 115 and 116: B ORDERING PHILOSOPHY duction that
Page 117 and 118: S PIELEN, THE ABYSS, AND THE CHILD
Page 129 and 130: T HE GREAT BEYOND source, from the
Page 131 and 132: T HE GREAT BEYOND completion. This
Page 133: T HE GREAT BEYOND proach practiced
Page 137 and 138: N ON-PHILOSOPHY does not build the
Page 139 and 140: N ON-PHILOSOPHY new fields of inqui
Page 141 and 142: N ON-PHILOSOPHY would do more justi
Page 143 and 144: N ON-PHILOSOPHY odology which is no
Page 145 and 146: O N THE VARIOUS MEANINGS OF “X IS
Page 157 and 158: B ETWEEN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND
Page 175 and 176: A RTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A NON-
Page 181 and 182: S TRUCTURALISM AND PHILOSOPHY sight
Page 183 and 184: S TRUCTURALISM AND PHILOSOPHY terme
Page 185 and 186:
S TRUCTURALISM AND PHILOSOPHY Geert
Page 187 and 188:
AI, STRUCTURALISM, AND SPIEL Of cou
Page 189 and 190:
CHAPTER IV CHESS, GAMES, AND FLIES
Page 191 and 192:
T HE DROSOPHILA OF AI. involvement
Page 193 and 194:
T HE DROSOPHILA OF AI. analogy. 6 T
Page 195 and 196:
T HE DROSOPHILA OF AI. engine of th
Page 197 and 198:
T HE DROSOPHILA OF AI. tists belong
Page 199 and 200:
G AME THEORETIC GAMES reductive. Th
Page 201 and 202:
G AME THEORETIC GAMES There are two
Page 203 and 204:
G AME THEORETIC GAMES player outsid
Page 205 and 206:
G AME THEORETIC GAMES The typical g
Page 207 and 208:
G AME THEORETIC GAMES After this ex
Page 209 and 210:
G AME THEORETIC GAMES become the st
Page 211 and 212:
C OMBINATORIAL EXPLOSIONS the diffi
Page 213 and 214:
C OMBINATORIAL EXPLOSIONS “soluti
Page 215 and 216:
C OMBINATORIAL EXPLOSIONS good move
Page 217 and 218:
C OMBINATORIAL EXPLOSIONS possible
Page 219 and 220:
C OMBINATORIAL EXPLOSIONS tive Beha
Page 221 and 222:
C OMBINATORIAL EXPLOSIONS in 1958 a
Page 223 and 224:
C OMBINATORIAL EXPLOSIONS tics pose
Page 225 and 226:
CHAPTER V STRUCTURES (AND SPACES) i
Page 227 and 228:
G AMES AND STRUCTURES same function
Page 229 and 230:
G AMES AND STRUCTURES ically limiti
Page 231 and 232:
conscious phenomena. F ROM LANGUAGE
Page 233 and 234:
F ROM LANGUAGE TO MYTH ulating an e
Page 235 and 236:
F ROM LANGUAGE TO MYTH ers, see as
Page 237 and 238:
F ROM LANGUAGE TO MYTH sents itself
Page 239 and 240:
Cadmos seeks his sister Europa, rav
Page 241 and 242:
F ROM LANGUAGE TO MYTH of oppositio
Page 243 and 244:
F ROM LANGUAGE TO MYTH blood relati
Page 245 and 246:
F ROM LANGUAGE TO MYTH spected, and
Page 247 and 248:
F ROM LANGUAGE TO MYTH It means tha
Page 249 and 250:
S EARCH- SPACES AND STRUCTURES peat
Page 251 and 252:
S EARCH- SPACES AND STRUCTURES or n
Page 253 and 254:
S EARCH- SPACES AND STRUCTURES betw
Page 255 and 256:
CHAPTER VI ANACLASTIC SUPPLEMENTS i
Page 257 and 258:
T HE SUPPLEMENT We now have an answ
Page 259 and 260:
T HE SUPPLEMENT Furthermore, let su
Page 261 and 262:
T HE SUPPLEMENT bers of ~C and AB.
Page 263 and 264:
T HE SUPPLEMENT the three sets A, B
Page 265 and 266:
T HE SUPPLEMENT Notice, again, that
Page 267 and 268:
F ORM AND CONTENT very word “stru
Page 269 and 270:
F ORM AND CONTENT that the former p
Page 271 and 272:
F ORM AND CONTENT completely differ
Page 273 and 274:
F ORM AND CONTENT pressing games, e
Page 275 and 276:
S TRUCTURE AND SUBSTANCE This does
Page 277 and 278:
S TRUCTURE AND SUBSTANCE classical
Page 279 and 280:
S TRUCTURE AND SUBSTANCE contexts]
Page 281 and 282:
S TRUCTURE AND SUBSTANCE Strauss’
Page 283 and 284:
S TRUCTURALISM, PHILOSOPHY, AND AI
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
T HE CHALLENGE OF CLOSURE methodolo
Page 297 and 298:
T HE CHALLENGE OF CLOSURE on any co
Page 299 and 300:
T HE CHALLENGE OF CLOSURE ing to L
Page 301 and 302:
T HE CHALLENGE OF CLOSURE other wor
Page 303 and 304:
T HE ANACLASTIC ILLUSION OF A TRANS
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
CHAPTER VIII A MOVABLE CONCLUSION w
Page 327 and 328:
A FTER GAME- BASED SPIELEN Play, th
Page 329 and 330:
REFERENCES Adorno, Theodor, Hegel:
Page 331 and 332:
Johns Hopkins UP, 1974). Derrida, J
Page 333 and 334:
Hewson, John, “Saussure's Game of
Page 335 and 336:
Mirowski, Philip, “When Games Gro
Page 337 and 338:
Searle, John, The Rediscovery of th
show all

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?