14.11.2012 Views

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B ETWEEN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND PHILOSOPHY.<br />

The goal of AI is to understand intelligence well enough to make machines<br />

that reach human level intelligence. Achieving this goal probably requires<br />

new ideas and therefore cannot be scheduled. 28<br />

McCarthy’s definition does not seem to take AI too far astray into theoretical space.<br />

After all, it can be argued that every engineering discipline is faced with a similar difficulty<br />

at the moment of its inception: the construction of an internal combustion engine, for ex-<br />

ample, depended and called for quite a bit of basic research in thermodynamics. Still there<br />

is an important difference concerning the reference of “intelligence.” The term is actually<br />

used in a strictly metonymic form in the expression “Artificial Intelligence.” As Turing’s<br />

paper makes clear, the real goal of the research is not “intelligence” per se, but the broader<br />

category of thinking in general. It may be worth remembering that, in spite of its title,<br />

“Computing Machinery and Intelligence” (the paper in which Turing proposed his test)<br />

contains the word “intelligence” only once and in a peripheral section. Instead, its very first<br />

sentence makes clear what is at stake, since Turing opens by saying: “I propose to ask the<br />

question: ‘Can machines think?’” and then goes on to propose its test as a more precise ren-<br />

dering of such a vaguely stated question. 29<br />

This, of course, is nothing new. That Artificial Intelligence studies the “mental” in gen-<br />

eral, the mind as such, is common currency in the field. Philosophers, in particulars, like to<br />

stress this point, but AI practitioners as well are very much aware of the bearings of their<br />

research. Thus, it is not only from the usual critics of AI, like John Searle and Hubert Drey-<br />

fus, that we hear this thesis but also from the leading figures in the discipline like John Mc-<br />

Carthy, Marvin Minsky, Herbert Simon and Allen Newell, etc. 30 What I am stressing here<br />

is the strict connection between the theoretical drive that aims at the study of “thinking”<br />

28. John McCarthy, “AI Needs a Basic Research Document,” available at http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc.<br />

29. Alan Turing, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” The <strong>Philosophy</strong> of Artificial Intelligence, Margaret<br />

Boden, ed., (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990) 40; the essay was originally published in<br />

1950. The term intelligence occurs toward the end of the paper, in the section devoted to the possibility<br />

and feasibility of a learning machine, when Turing remarks that “by the exercise of intelligence” the<br />

AI researcher should be able to speed up the selection of better and better forms of thinking machines,<br />

i.e. he should be able to accelarate the machine equivalent of the natural evolutionary processes that<br />

has most likely brought about “natural” human intelligence (62). In short, the only use of the word “intelligence”<br />

in the paper means something very different from its use in AI.<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!