14.11.2012 Views

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184<br />

C HESS, GAMES, AND FLIES<br />

existence of dominant and recessive traits in particular genes, and by explaining the appear-<br />

ance of visible mutants by their combinations.<br />

However, very soon the Drosophila colonies started to work all too well for the neo-<br />

Mendelian paradigm. Unlike Gregor Mendel’s famous green/yellow peas or Cuénot’s<br />

brown/white/yellow coated mice, Morgan’s fruit flies did not stabilize into a few diverse<br />

variations of the same morphological element. New mutants continued to come up and each<br />

new eye-color (for example) implied that the Mendelian formulas had to be rewritten. Since<br />

the formulas explained the visible characters as an exhaustive combination of basic genes<br />

(later traits), each unexpected mutation sent the geneticists back to the drawing board. 9 This<br />

fact (plus other facts, I am simplifying here) directed Morgan’s group away from neo-Men-<br />

delian explanations toward a different, and more stable, theory of hereditary variation, e.g.<br />

the theory of the gene, and toward the postulation of crossing-over and linkage mechanisms<br />

during chromosome splitting. In turn, the shift from one theory to the other forced another<br />

change in experimental work: neo-Mendelian searches for possible variations were aban-<br />

doned in favor of the technique of genetic mapping that permitted a more stable, quantita-<br />

tive account of mutations capable of almost indefinite expansion (60).<br />

This shift, however, forced a change in the relationship between the insect, the theo-<br />

rists’ and the theory, that now affected directly the fruit fly. In order to obtain the precise<br />

quantitative mapping that the new theory required, the Drosophila stocks had to be liberat-<br />

ed from all the “genetic noise” generated by other kinds of genes naturally occurring in wild<br />

fruit flies. As Kohler puts it, in order to be turned into “a standard experimental instrument<br />

[...] every new type of genetic noise—lethals, suppressors, modifiers—had to be identified<br />

and eliminated, one by one. Drosophila, so to speak, had to be debugged.” 10 The history of<br />

the interaction between genetic theory and Drosophila does not stop here. Kohler shows,<br />

for example, how the standard form of the “constructed” insect that was essential to the suc-<br />

cess of the precise, quantitative genetic mapping turned into a major liability when scien-<br />

9. Kohler, for example, reports Morgan’s desperation when, after having reworked the Mendelian formula<br />

for the third time in two years of intensive labor, yet another eye-color mutant popped up unexpectedly.<br />

See Morgan and Bridges’ s report quoted in Robert Kohler, Lords of the Fly…, 60-61.<br />

10. Robert Kohler, Lords of the Fly…, 66.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!