14.11.2012 Views

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T HE IRREPARABLE LIGHT OF DAWN<br />

the possibility of the meaningfulness of any experience by the recognition of the subject’s<br />

failure to transcend the limits of its own language and its own history—produces exactly<br />

the opposite effect. As we seen above, it is precisely at the moment when even the ultimate<br />

experience, death itself, becomes an empty simulacrum that the final transfiguration takes<br />

place: to expose the purely positional nature of any possible experience, to show its essen-<br />

tial voidness, means to bring about the total combinatorial system in which everything<br />

means because it refers to everything else.<br />

If the intrinsic and inevitable duplicity of Mr. Palomar’s death arches back from the<br />

end of the book to its beginning and to the whole novel, then how should we read in Mr.<br />

Palomar? The book seems to end on a tragic note: not even defeat is possible, not even<br />

death. Mr. Palomar is forever condemned to play games others have started, prisoner of the<br />

most original inauthenticity. He had begun his search from in anxious consciousness of a<br />

separation from the world. Once the search is over, he cannot but recognize the inevitability<br />

of the original fracture. His meager and sole consolation is that he can enjoy his understand-<br />

ing of its inexorable internal dynamics.<br />

But is such a consolation really meager or is it more than is ordinarily given to think?<br />

4. The irreparable light of dawn<br />

The reading of Mr. Palomar I attempted in the preceding pages has shown that the im-<br />

possibility to reach a full experience of the worlds and things and the consequent search for<br />

harmony—i.e. the search for an organic relationship with the world in which the subject is<br />

completely absorbed by the system outside him—generates what I called the “dialectic of<br />

partiality.” “Partial” because the connection of the subject of experience with the world is<br />

always imperfect insofar as it is always marked by a fracture impossible to transcend with-<br />

out the generation of a dialectic that produces a recurring transmutation of one of its mo-<br />

ments into its opposite.<br />

Mr. Palomar is able to carry out his everyday affairs, he can buy his cheese and he can<br />

hear the blackbirds, although in an inauthentic way; when he tries to overcome such inau-<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!