14.11.2012 Views

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

2. Philosophy - Stefano Franchi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T HE WORLD OF CANDRAKIRTI<br />

biguity, in other words, is structural, because it is impossible, on the basis of the text, to<br />

decide for one or for the other; that is, it is impossible to decide whether Mr. Palomar’s fate<br />

is a triumph or a rout.<br />

Paradoxically enough, the last remark makes even more enigmatic the status of the in-<br />

dex. In fact, it seems to oscillate between two opposite and irreconcilable extremes. On the<br />

one hand, it can be read as the exemplification of the combinatorial structure that pervades<br />

the whole work. In this sense, and in virtue of its privileged textual position, the index can<br />

be interpreted as the reason and ground of Mr. Palomar. On the other hand, the very expo-<br />

sition of such an interpretation makes it unacceptable. The paratextual position of the index<br />

implies a distance between its content and the text that makes the whole combinatorial con-<br />

struction vain, since its content—the thematization of the combinatorial game—should be<br />

present within the text as one of the possible experiences. The perfect language capable of<br />

expressing every possible experience cannot tolerate any meta-linguistic reflection, lest its<br />

perfection be lost 15 . The contradiction between these two aspects of the index, the contra-<br />

diction between what the index says of the text and what it does to it in virtue of its external<br />

location, the contradiction between its constative and performative dimensions is ultimate-<br />

ly unsolvable. Its logical status, even its very existence contradict what it says.<br />

This has some broader implications for the interpretation of Mr. Palomar at large. The<br />

reading offered by the index succeeds in the difficult task of enclosing in a single gesture<br />

the essential duplicity of the text that we have I have shown is condensed in its last sen-<br />

tence. In the index—and in the whole text—both irreconcilable dimensions of triumph and<br />

defeat are simultaneously present. Mr. Palomar, to put it differently, brings to view the ir-<br />

reducible antinomy generated by the fracture of presence, by the original division from the<br />

world of things and of the others, an antinomy that I have tried to retrace in the paradigmatic<br />

form it assumes in the death of Mr. Palomar and particularly in the double dimension of<br />

triumph and defeat that distinguishes it. The triumph that abolishes the original division in<br />

a total communion with the world of pure appearance under the aegis of combinatorics and<br />

15. See Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s characterization of the perfect language in Maurice Merleau-Ponty,<br />

The Prose of the World (Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973) 3-8.<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!