Accreditation - Hartnell College!!

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Institutional Self Evaluation – 12-05-12 __________________________________________________________ II.C.1.d The institution provides effective maintenance and security for its library and other learning support services. __________________________________________________________ Descriptive Summary Campus Safety provides security to the library, to library patrons, and to the library resources and collections. The library uses Checkpoint Systems Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology for checking out materials and alerting library staff when items leave the building without proper check out. Library Technical Services staff place RFID tags in all cataloged new books and media. The library building is alarmed and Campus Safety arms the building in the evening after the library closes, and disarms the building before it opens. Cameras are pointed at library entrances, exits, and remote locations. Self Evaluation Overall, the library is quite secure. Meetings and classes pose the biggest challenge when outside doors are left wide open, or exit doors are not firmly closed. In these situations materials and equipment can quickly disappear even if security tags are in place. The library staff works to improve communication with other college departments and personnel to raise awareness of security issues. The college meets this standard. Planning Agenda Library staff will work to raise awareness of library building security issues among other college departments and personnel. __________________________________________________________ II.C.1.e When the institution relies on or collaborates with other institutions or other sources for library and other learning support services for its instructional programs, it documents that formal agreements exist and that such resources and services are adequate for the institution’s intended purposes, are easily accessible, and utilized. The performance of these services is evaluated on a regular basis. The institution takes responsibility for and assures the reliability of all services provided either directly or through contractual arrangement. Page 184
Institutional Self Evaluation – 12-05-12 __________________________________________________________ Descriptive Summary Hartnell College Library collaborates with other college and public libraries through its memberships in the Pacific Library Partnership (PLP), Monterey Bay Area Cooperative Library System (MOBAC), The Califa Library Group, Community College Library Consortium (CCLC), Council of Chief Librarians for California Community Colleges (CCL), and other consortia. PLP/MOBAC provides delivery service between local libraries, expedites interlibrary loan service, offers networking opportunities to librarians and staff through its committees, lobbies on behalf of libraries in Sacramento, and offers free professional development workshops. The library also has an agreement with California State University, Monterey Bay Library (CSUMB) to share their integrated library system, Voyager/ExLibris. CSUMB and Hartnell Libraries are currently working together to create a written agreement to document this arrangement (II.C.30). Self Evaluation Annually before memberships are renewed, the appropriate librarians and library staff discuss the pros and cons of membership in the various organizations. Past consensus has been that membership costs are low compared with the benefits received. The CSUMB-Community College Library Voyager/ExLibris consortium is periodically discussed and reviewed. Hartnell has heavily relied on CSUMB for system support with minimal staff time, few down times, and very low costs. The community college library members of this informal consortium—Hartnell, Monterey Peninsula College Library, and Gavilan College Library—met in December 2011, and then in May 2012. The librarians discussed the future of the integrated library system consortium, the development of a memorandum of clarification regarding the consortium, and alternatives to Voyager/ExLibris. A revised draft memorandum of clarification has been proposed to consortium members, and all consortium members have indicated via email that they approve The college meets this standard. Planning Agenda Library staff will continue to work towards finalizing the Voyager agreement between CSUMB-Community College Library Voyager/ExLibris consortium members by fall 2013. ________________________________________________________ Page 185
Page 1 and 2:
H A R T N E L L C O M M U N I T Y C
Page 3 and 4:
Institutional Self Evaluation - 12-
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
BSI Improvement (%) Institutional S
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136: Institutional Self Evaluation - 12-
Page 185: Institutional Self Evaluation - 12-
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Approximately $9.7 million or 21% o
Page 253 and 254:
The college meets this standard. Pl
Page 255 and 256:
levels that support the college’s
Page 257 and 258:
III.D.1.b Institutional planning re
Page 259 and 260:
Assumptions are reviewed during the
Page 261 and 262:
The institutional planning and asse
Page 263 and 264:
The audit report includes a managem
Page 265 and 266:
financial decision making process i
Page 267 and 268:
III.D.3.a The institution has suffi
Page 269 and 270:
and restricted funds; and to demons
Page 271 and 272:
Planning Agenda None. III.D.3.d The
Page 273 and 274:
III.D.3.g Contractual agreements wi
Page 275 and 276:
III.D.4 Financial resource planning
Page 277 and 278:
Standard III D: Evidence III.D.1 Ha
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331:
show all

Accreditation - Hartnell College!!

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?