13.03.2015 Views

Accreditation - Hartnell College!!

Accreditation - Hartnell College!!

Accreditation - Hartnell College!!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Institutional Self Evaluation – 12-05-12<br />

Information Skills: students will define information needs, access information<br />

efficiently and effectively, evaluate information critically, and use information<br />

ethically.<br />

Critical Thinking: students will use quantitative and logical reasoning to analyze<br />

information, evaluate ideas, and solve problems.<br />

Global Awareness: students will demonstrate knowledge of global interdependence;<br />

others‘ values, cultures and beliefs; and the ability to describe one‘s own cultural<br />

heritage.<br />

Aesthetic Appreciation: students will critically reflect upon works of visual and<br />

performing arts in a diverse cultural context.<br />

Personal Growth and Responsibility: students will select lifestyle choices that<br />

promote physical and mental well-being; students will demonstrate the importance of<br />

being an informed, ethical, and active citizen in their community and the world.<br />

Two ILOs (critical thinking and written communication competencies) were assessed first as<br />

a pilot by the SLO Committee in 2008 and then by faculty during Flex Day activities in<br />

January 2009 and January 2010. (IIA.22) The process for this assessment began several<br />

weeks in advance of the Flex Day assessments, as research papers were collected across<br />

disciplines and scoring rubrics were developed by the SLO and PPA Committees with the<br />

consultation of subject matter experts. (IIA.23) During the Flex Day, SLO and PPA<br />

Committee members trained faculty to use the rubrics and then divided faculty members into<br />

scoring groups. Faculty then scored papers using the rubrics. (IIA. 24)<br />

Since the initial pilot effort in spring 2008, more than 225 writing samples of research papers<br />

have been collected and scored. Papers have been segregated into groups reflective of the<br />

total number of units students have completed to test the hypotheses that students should<br />

score higher on the written competency assessment measure after they have completed more<br />

units. Results of these activities have generated further discussion on the need to augment<br />

English/ESL assessment and placement for students early in their academic careers and the<br />

need to encourage ―Writing Across the Curriculum‖ activities. Workshops conducted by<br />

English faculty members provided follow-up activities and further discussion.<br />

With the implementation of assessment measures, there has been an increased recognition of<br />

common threads among disciplines and programs and the common problems that must be<br />

solved at the institutional level. Instructors are embracing the concept that general education<br />

is the responsibility of all faculty members.<br />

Building on the steps that have been taken, the SLO and PPA Committees worked with<br />

faculty during 2011-12 to design two new tools for assessing institutional competencies. One<br />

tool again focuses upon an assessment of research papers and measures outcomes in areas<br />

of communication, information competency, and critical thinking. A subcommittee has<br />

worked to identify general education courses that require research papers and to collect<br />

student papers. The assessment process will use rubrics developed specifically for each core<br />

competency.<br />

Page 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!