Accreditation - Hartnell College!!

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Institutional Self Evaluation – 12-05-12 Nathaniel McGriff – Enrollment Services Specialist (CS) Cathy Noble – Instructional Counselor (F)* Mercedes Quintero – Adjunct Counselor, Early Childhood Education (F) Laura Zavala – Coordinator, Tutorial Services, Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) (CS) Standard III – Resources Co-Chairs Lindsey Bertomen – Instructor, Administration of Justice (F) Matt Coombs – Vice President, Information & Technology Resources/Library and Learning Resource Center (A) Contributing Writers Sharon Alheit – Grants Manager (A) David Beymer – Instructor, Athletics/Athletic Trainer (F) Alexander Edens – Instructor, Biology (F) Maria Dolores Javier – Controller (A) Tammy Moreno – Systems Specialist, Human Resources & EEO (CS) Alfred Munoz – Interim Vice President, Support Operations (A) Jerri Nemiro – Instructor, Art (F) Eric Price – Computer/Telephone Technician (CS) Terri Pyer – Associate Vice President, Human Resources & EEO (A) Joseph Reyes – Director, Operations, Maintenance & Asset Management (A) Abel Rodarte – Senior Programmer Analyst (CS) Dora Sanchez – Payroll Supervisor (CS) Standard IV – Leadership and Governance Co-Chairs Paulette Bumbalough – Dean, Economic Development & South County Education Services (A) Ann Wright – Instructor, Biology (F) Contributing Writers Patricia Donohue – Elected Member, Board of Trustees (B) Beverly Grova – Vice President, Advancement (through February 2012) (A)* Sunita Lanka – Instructor, English (F) Erica Padilla-Chavez – President, Board of Trustees (B) Melissa Stave – Instructor, Athletics/Adaptive PE Specialist (F) PARTICIPATION IN SELF EVALUATION ACTIVITIES The Self Evaluation process has included the following key activities: holding regular meetings; iterative drafting of report sections; providing briefings to the Board of Trustees and other Page 32
Institutional Self Evaluation – 12-05-12 governance groups; and soliciting input and feedback. Drafts were made available to the college community as the document evolved. Presentations were made at meetings, and discussions were held with individual representatives of governance groups including the Academic, Classified and Student Senates and/or senators. To ensure that the document is inclusive and to prepare the college for the site visit, several flex days have been (partially or largely) devoted to accreditation-related activities and events. Additional activities are noteworthy. For participating in web training on accreditation activities, faculty members received professional development credit toward their required hours, and staff members were provided the opportunity to participate in a drawing for an iPad. Subsequent to the Spring 2011 kick-off of the reaffirmation of accreditation initiative, and despite institutional fiscal challenges, many faculty, staff, and administrators have attended conferences and workshops on a wide range of accreditation-related issues, such as learning outcomes assessment, student success, and distance education. The Board of Trustees has held several development sessions on accreditation-related matters, such as strategic planning and governance. Also noteworthy is that, through their involvement in the Self Evaluation process, several college employees became interested in attending commission events as well as serving on visit teams for the commission. TIMELINE FOR THE SELF EVALUATION PROCESS The initial timeline for the Self Evaluation process was established in Spring 2011 and revised each semester thereafter to accommodate additional activities and adjustments in workflow. Planning charts with due dates, dates of Steering Committee meetings, and other key events were issued in advance of each semester. The following Self Evaluation timeline was current as of October 2012 and contains critical dates from the kick-off of the initiative through the anticipated site visit. Spring 2011 April 15, 2011 May 19, 2011 Summer 2011 July 7, 2011 August 10, 2011 August, 2011 Team of nine persons participate in ACCJC training at San Jose City College Meeting with Vice President of Academic Affairs And Accreditation, Faculty Coordinator, and team leaders to identify prospective writing team members Meeting with writing team co-chairs to distribute Templates with question prompts from ACCJC documentation Meeting with VPAA, Dean of S&BS and Accreditation, faculty coordinator, and writing team co-chairs to prepare for regular meetings and activities Regular meetings of Steering Committee and Planning Team commence Page 33
Page 1 and 2: H A R T N E L L C O M M U N I T Y C
Page 3 and 4: Institutional Self Evaluation - 12-
Page 33: Institutional Self Evaluation - 12-
Page 77 and 78: BSI Improvement (%) Institutional S
Page 85 and 86:
Institutional Self Evaluation - 12-
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Approximately $9.7 million or 21% o
Page 253 and 254:
The college meets this standard. Pl
Page 255 and 256:
levels that support the college’s
Page 257 and 258:
III.D.1.b Institutional planning re
Page 259 and 260:
Assumptions are reviewed during the
Page 261 and 262:
The institutional planning and asse
Page 263 and 264:
The audit report includes a managem
Page 265 and 266:
financial decision making process i
Page 267 and 268:
III.D.3.a The institution has suffi
Page 269 and 270:
and restricted funds; and to demons
Page 271 and 272:
Planning Agenda None. III.D.3.d The
Page 273 and 274:
III.D.3.g Contractual agreements wi
Page 275 and 276:
III.D.4 Financial resource planning
Page 277 and 278:
Standard III D: Evidence III.D.1 Ha
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331:
show all

Accreditation - Hartnell College!!

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?