Mujahideen Tactics in the Soviet-Afghan War - Bennett Park Raiders
Mujahideen Tactics in the Soviet-Afghan War - Bennett Park Raiders
Mujahideen Tactics in the Soviet-Afghan War - Bennett Park Raiders
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 11, Vignette 9 Page 315<br />
wounded," we would tell <strong>the</strong>m. They would refuse.<br />
Except for <strong>the</strong> Ta'bils offensive and ambushes, we were defend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The <strong>Soviet</strong>s were <strong>the</strong>re <strong>in</strong> strength, but <strong>the</strong>y stayed on <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong> with<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir tanks and artillery and seldom committed <strong>the</strong>ir own <strong>in</strong>fantry.<br />
Their tanks and artillery blackened <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>. It seemed that <strong>the</strong>y<br />
must have had a thousand of <strong>the</strong>m, but <strong>the</strong>y just stayed <strong>the</strong>re. The<br />
DRA <strong>in</strong>fantry was do<strong>in</strong>g most of <strong>the</strong> attack<strong>in</strong>g and dy<strong>in</strong>g. The fight<br />
bled <strong>the</strong> DRA to <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t where <strong>the</strong>y could not take any more casualties.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, after 34 days of fight<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> enemy forces broke contact<br />
at 1100 hours and withdrew. In <strong>the</strong> past, <strong>the</strong> enemy had tried to take<br />
us, but never had he come <strong>in</strong> such force or stayed for so long.<br />
We lost up to 60 <strong>Mujahideen</strong> and commanders KIA <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> base and<br />
many o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> areas around <strong>the</strong> base. DRA and <strong>Soviet</strong> casualties are<br />
unknown, but we were always catch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> enemy <strong>in</strong> surprise attacks,<br />
so his casualties must have been much higher than ours. DRA casualties<br />
were def<strong>in</strong>itely higher than <strong>Soviet</strong> casualties. I feel that <strong>the</strong><br />
enemy f<strong>in</strong>ally quit due to his casualties. 12<br />
COMMENTARY: The <strong>Soviet</strong>s used <strong>the</strong> conscript DRA <strong>in</strong>fantry extensively<br />
and supported <strong>the</strong>m with artillery and air power. The DRA <strong>in</strong>fantry<br />
was poorly tra<strong>in</strong>ed and equipped and had serious morale problems.<br />
The use of DRA forces as "throw-away" <strong>in</strong>fantry did noth<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
morale. DRA forces had a reputation for passivity on <strong>the</strong> battlefield<br />
and desert<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> first opportunity.<br />
The <strong>Mujahideen</strong> defenses were relatively weak from <strong>the</strong> Jelawor<br />
direction, but <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soviet</strong>s apparently did not push hard enough on this<br />
axis to discover this. <strong>Soviet</strong> and DRA tactical <strong>in</strong>telligence efforts<br />
appear <strong>in</strong>adequate.<br />
The <strong>Soviet</strong>/DRA will<strong>in</strong>gness to drag combat out for 34 days and<br />
<strong>the</strong>n break contact and withdraw is remarkable. Their refusal to<br />
push for quicker resolution streng<strong>the</strong>ned <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mujahideen</strong> hand and<br />
gradually created a qualitative change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> situation to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Mujahideen</strong> advantage. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> fragmented nature of<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>Mujahideen</strong> resistance meant that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mujahideen</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
1<br />
^ Page 6, <strong>Afghan</strong>istan Report #40, July 1987, published by <strong>the</strong> Crisis & Conflict Analysis<br />
Team of <strong>the</strong> Institute of Strategic Studies <strong>in</strong> Islamabad, Pakistan: "It was reported that over<br />
a period of one and a half month (sic) end<strong>in</strong>g June, 1987, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soviet</strong>-Kabul troops had suffered<br />
about 250 soldiers killed and 800 <strong>in</strong>jured <strong>in</strong> Qandahar city and its suburbs. They lost<br />
more than 100 vehicles, tanks, and jeeps, besides 13 aircraft/helicopters. About 2,500<br />
<strong>Afghan</strong> government soldiers jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mujahideen</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g this what seemed to be <strong>the</strong><br />
longest <strong>Soviet</strong>-Kabul operation aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> <strong>Mujahideen</strong> for several years. The offensive<br />
apparently spilled over <strong>in</strong>to July 1987."