09.07.2015 Views

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.3.1.3 Coordination <strong>of</strong> activities and stakeholdersThe broad participation needed for REDD+ and the magnitude <strong>of</strong> activities alreadyperformed both within various sectors and having started up as a result <strong>of</strong> REDD+,preconditions proper coordination. The same applies for the various policies and actswhich govern said activities. We will come back to this later. Nationally, both intersectoraland cross-sectoral coordination has previously been lacking, and has beenaccounted to contribute to the failure <strong>of</strong> previous forest conservation efforts. As wehave previously seen, the coordination between the Vice President´s Office - Division<strong>of</strong> Environment and the NEMC has been poor given the lack <strong>of</strong> guidelines, resultingin an overlapping <strong>of</strong> responsibilities and a struggle over whom to oversee what withinthe area <strong>of</strong> environmental issues. And this is further complicated by the MNRT whichalso has a mandate that overlaps with those <strong>of</strong> the NEMC and VPO-DoE. Crosssectoralcoordination has not been much better.With a system unable to deal with conflicting interests and activities, either betweenForest Dependent communities and the Forest Department or between developmentactivities within different sectors such as forestry and agriculture, it has placed theentire forest resource under jeopardy and compromised stakeholders` underlyinginterests <strong>of</strong> a well-managed forest for sustainable livelihood (United Republic <strong>of</strong>Tanzania 2010). The strategy has thus put forward the need to create a system whichcan both coordinate horizontally across sectors, such as agriculture, wildlife andforestry, and vertically between parastatal, central or local government institutions. Inorder to do this, they emphasise a problem solving approach which includes multisectoralcollaboration and the formation <strong>of</strong> an expanded partnership which willresolve conflicts and improve the overall quality <strong>of</strong> management <strong>of</strong> forest resource inthe context <strong>of</strong> REDD+ (United Republic <strong>of</strong> Tanzania 2010, p.26.). Specific details onhow this will be achieved, has not been put forward. However, we expect the REDD+Action Plan will shed more light on this issue.Since its establishment, the REDD+ Taskforce, facilitated by the REDD+ Secretariat,has had the overall responsibility <strong>of</strong> coordinating all REDD+ activities and creating awell functioning and efficient coordination system which includes all the necessarystakeholders. Given the temporary nature <strong>of</strong> these two bodies, though, theresponsibility will in the future be transferred to the NCCSC which will work as theREDD+ coordination <strong>of</strong>fice and the NCCTC which will function as the overseer <strong>of</strong> alltechnical issues related to REDD+ implementation (United Republic <strong>of</strong> Tanzania157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!