09.07.2015 Views

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

occur as a result <strong>of</strong> REDD, some issues were still seen as being <strong>of</strong> particular concernwhich we can see below in Table 59.Table 59: Issues associated with REDD+, Kilosa District, Tanzania, 2010DisagreeDisagreesomewhatAgreesomewhatAgreeMean%It will result in corruption 63 3 9 25 1.95Unequal distribution <strong>of</strong>paymentsPayments will go only to landownersThere will be less conflicts inthe village/community51 2 12 34 2.2951 4 11 33 2.2623 2 11 64 3.15It will increase privatization<strong>of</strong> land57 5 7 31 2.13Surprisingly there were no big differences in opinion between wealth groups, wherefor instance 25% in all three groups thought there might be corruption, and whenasked whether they thought there would be unequal distribution 36% and 37% withinthe poorest and middle income group agreed, whereas 30% <strong>of</strong> the least poor answeredthe same. They however also had 20% somewhat agreeing.As previously the villagers in Nyali seemed the more skeptic, with 66% thinking theremight be unequal distribution <strong>of</strong> payments (approximately 35% in Lunenzi andMasugu) and 50% fearing there might be corruption, compared with around 20% inMasugu and Lunenzi. Whether a result <strong>of</strong> an overall more negative view on theproject as a whole, or as a result <strong>of</strong> a less good relationship between villagers and withthe village government is hard to tell. In fact, when previously assessing theserelationships Masugu for instance noted worse social relationships than in Nyali. Thelack <strong>of</strong> belief in corruption or unequal distribution in Lunenzi on the other hand canmore easily be attributed to their social cohesion both between the villagers and agood relationship with their village government.Much <strong>of</strong> the concern for mismanagement <strong>of</strong> funding and unequal distribution <strong>of</strong>payments was concerned with who would be the overall authority responsible for themanagement <strong>of</strong> REDD+ and for its distribution, and to some extent specifically howmuch the Village Government would be involved. Overall people felt that the morerepresentative <strong>of</strong> the people the management authority was the less chance <strong>of</strong>256

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!