09.07.2015 Views

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

View/Open - Sokoine University of Agriculture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As a final summarising point we put forward the main challenges we have gonethrough and view them specifically on the basis <strong>of</strong> the 3Es. This can be seen in Table60.Table 60: Main challenges <strong>of</strong> TFCG and MJUMITAs pilot project, on the basis<strong>of</strong> the 3EsEfficiency: High opportunity and transaction costs Complexity <strong>of</strong> program calls for extensive awareness rising, capacity building andtraining Time consuming MRV activities for local community and dependency on externalexperts Lack <strong>of</strong> hands-on accountability and transparency measures NGO driven – lack <strong>of</strong> district ownership, lack <strong>of</strong> broad-based district involvement Splitting up project area in many small forest areas Poor uptake <strong>of</strong> carbon in dry Miombo woodlands Poor storage capacity in well managed forestsEffectiveness: Reduced emissions only from selected forests with oversight <strong>of</strong> other forestlandscapes Village leakage strategy - insufficient inclusion <strong>of</strong> pastoralists and “outside” views Insufficient market considerations and power-structure <strong>of</strong> charcoal/timber trade NGO driven – lack <strong>of</strong> district ownership, lack <strong>of</strong> broad-based district involvement Insufficient time?Equity: Lack <strong>of</strong> specific measurements against elite capture(Co-benefits:) Biodiversity Poverty reductionIn terms <strong>of</strong> Effectiveness, we question the overall ability to reduce emissions as onlyselected forests are included, while heavily used forest landscapes are not taken intoconsideration. In addition, what we see as an insufficient consideration <strong>of</strong> majorstakeholders such as local pastoralists can have grave effects on the ability to avoidleakage and thus undermine the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the project. Market pressures andpolitical power networks within the forest sector might also undermine theeffectiveness <strong>of</strong> the project, as these will be difficult to tackle by the project alone.Likewise the relatively low inclusion <strong>of</strong> district staff will then not improve thissituation. We also question the projects ability to carry out all the planned activitieswithin the timeframe they have been given.278

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!