12.07.2015 Views

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12.5 High-Dose <strong>Ion</strong> <strong>Implantation</strong> 169to be related to the Ar energy. However, the steady-state surface composition wasquite independent <strong>of</strong> the Ar energy.The majority <strong>of</strong> sputtered atoms emerge only from the outermost few atomiclayers. Therefore, with preferential sputtering, a compositional change is onlyexpected in the outermost few atomic layers versus a compositional change in adepth comparable to the ion range. The observed thickness <strong>of</strong> the altered layerrequires some atomic mixing or interdiffusion that can propagate the compositionalchange from the surface to the deeper region. Either the atoms move inwardto dilute the surface enrichment, or they move outward to replenish the depletion<strong>of</strong> preferentially sputtered atoms at the surface, eventually changing thecomposition over the whole layer.12.5 High-Dose <strong>Ion</strong> <strong>Implantation</strong>In high-dose implantation, the atomic mixing, sputtering, <strong>and</strong> chemical effectsdetermine the state <strong>of</strong> the material after implantation. In general, the maximumconcentration attainable by ion implantation is given by the reciprocal <strong>of</strong> thesputtering yield. This occurs because <strong>of</strong> the receding <strong>of</strong> the sample surface (due tosputter erosion) or, equivalently, because <strong>of</strong> the sputter removal <strong>of</strong> the implantedspecies. This maximum concentration is obtained after the sputter removal <strong>of</strong> alayer <strong>of</strong> thickness comparable to the ion range, R P (more exactly, R P + ∆R P ).However, more careful consideration should be given if there is preferentialsputtering between atoms <strong>of</strong> the host material <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> the implanted species.There is also an interesting variation when ion species A is implanted into acompound, AB. In this analysis it will be assumed that atomic mixing is veryefficient, so that the implanted species spreads out rather uniformly over aneffective width R P , after an initial amount <strong>of</strong> implantation, say 10 16 atoms cm −2 .The shape <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile is assumed to remain approximately unchanged, with itsamplitude increasing with further implantation. This model is illustrated inFig. 12.8.The conservation <strong>of</strong> atoms requiresdNARP= Ji− JdtA(12.17)where N A is the atomic concentration <strong>of</strong> the implanted species, J i is the flux <strong>of</strong>incident ions (<strong>of</strong> species A), <strong>and</strong> J A is the flux <strong>of</strong> the sputtered A atoms. Therelationship between J A , J B , <strong>and</strong> J i is the same as given by (12.6) <strong>and</strong> (12.7),namely J B /J A = r(N B /N A ) <strong>and</strong> (J A + J B ) = YJ i . The sputtering yield Y isapproximated as a constant throughout the implantation process, <strong>and</strong> the variable xis defined as x = N A /N B . Then, (12.6) <strong>and</strong> (12.7) give

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!