12.07.2015 Views

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 6 <strong>Ion</strong> Range <strong>and</strong> Range Distribution6.3.3 Range Straggling<strong>Ion</strong> implantation is a stochastic (r<strong>and</strong>om) process. The mean projected rangerepresents the most probable location for an ion to come to rest. The uncertainty inthe scattering process as the ion travels through the target gives rise to ions comingto rest at distances less than <strong>and</strong> greater than the projected range. The averagefluctuation (st<strong>and</strong>ard derivation from the mean) in the projected range is calledrange straggling, ∆R p .The influence <strong>of</strong> ion mass, M 1 , <strong>and</strong> target mass, M 2 , on the range straggling isschematically shown in Fig. 1.2 (also see Fig. 6.4). As can be seen, the trajectories<strong>of</strong> the lighter species in a heavier substrate exhibit larger deviations <strong>of</strong> their implanttrajectories relative to those <strong>of</strong> the heavy ions in relatively lighter substrates.This behavior is influenced by the same conservation <strong>of</strong> momentum <strong>and</strong> energyphysics that applies the scattering <strong>of</strong> macroscopic hard spheres, e.g., shootingmarbles into a collection <strong>of</strong> billiard balls versus the opposite case <strong>of</strong> shooting abilliard ball into a collection <strong>of</strong> marbles. In the former case, the marble projectilewill be more easily deflected from its incident course while in the latter case thebilliard ball will plow ahead without as much lateral deviation. These differencesin (elastic) nuclear scattering properties will influence the extremes in stoppinglocations <strong>and</strong> the width <strong>of</strong> the ion distribution in the solid. For the same physicalreasons, a wider depth distribution is expected for M 1 (ion) < M 2 (substrate atom)relative to the depth distribution for M 1 > M 2 .The range straggling can be calculated using the theory <strong>of</strong> Lindhard et al. forthe condition where nuclear stopping dominates from∆ R p ≅ R p /2.5.(6.14)As an example <strong>of</strong> (6.14), we will estimate the mean projected range straggling forthe two cases, 13 keV B in Si <strong>and</strong> 35 keV As in Si, which produces an R p <strong>of</strong> 50 nmfor both ions. The PRAL code gives 28.0 <strong>and</strong> 20.9 nm for ∆R p , for B <strong>and</strong> As, respectively.Therefore R p /∆R p = 1.8 <strong>and</strong> 2.4 for B <strong>and</strong> As, respectively, in reasonableagreement with (6.14).A general relationship between projected range straggling <strong>and</strong> the mean projectedrange, for the mass conditions 0.1 ≤ M 2 /M 1 ≤ 10, has been developed byWSS <strong>and</strong> is plotted in Fig. 6.4. The value ∆R px is the range straggling in the direction<strong>of</strong> the incident ion, <strong>and</strong> ∆R py is the range straggling in the direction perpendicularto the incident ion.6.3.4 Polyatomic TargetsThe accurate treatment <strong>of</strong> ion ranges in compound targets requires extensive calculations,as performed in the PRAL code. However, estimates can be made using

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!