12.07.2015 Views

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.7 Screening Length 191χ(x) = 0.1818e -3.2x +0.5099e -0.9423x +0.2802e -0.4029x +0.02817e -0.2016x10 −1a U = 0.8854 x 0.529/(Z 10.23 + Z 2 0.23 )χ(x)−210Thomas-FermiMoliere−310BohrLenz-Jensen10 −40 1020 30Reduced Radius, x=r/aFig. 2.2. The reduced screening functions <strong>of</strong> (2.15). This screening function is identified asχ U , a universal screening function, with its argument, x, being defined as x ≡ r/a U , where a Uis the universal screening length given in (2.17) (Ziegler et al. 1985).a0.8853a0B=1/22/3 2/3( Z1 + Z2),(2.20)where a 0 is the Bohr radius, 0.0529 nm, <strong>and</strong> Z 1 <strong>and</strong> Z 2 are the atomic numbers <strong>of</strong>the two atoms. Firsov suggested that the interatomic potential would be best describedusing a reduced distance defined by a screening length <strong>of</strong> the forma0.8853a0F=2/31/2 1/2( Z1 + Z2),(2.21)with the constant 0.8853 being derived from the Thomas–Fermi atom. FollowingBohr, Lindhard also suggested using the atomic Thomas–Fermi screening functionfor the interatomic screening function, but with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!