12.07.2015 Views

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

194 14 Application <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ion</strong> <strong>Implantation</strong> Techniques in CMOS FabricationV Q C (14.2)d= B /oxwhere C ox is the oxide capacitance per unit area, <strong>and</strong> Q B is bulk charge, which iscontrolled by the gate. One basic model to estimate the effect <strong>of</strong> device scaling onthe change in V T was given by Yau (1974). Figure 14.1a–c shows a threedimensionalsketch <strong>of</strong> a NMOSFET with its cross-section views. The key in Yau’smodel is the introduction <strong>of</strong> a trapezoidal region representing the gate-controlledcharge. The charge beyond that region (shaded area) is controlled by the source<strong>and</strong> drain. By subtracting the shaded triangular region from the rectangular region,the charge controlled by the gate is given byQB= area(EFHG) − 2 × area(AGH)⎛cB WLW c 2 ∆LW⎞= qN ⎜ − W2⎟(14.3)⎝⎠where q is the electric charge, N B is the channel doping concentration, W is thewidth <strong>of</strong> the device, <strong>and</strong> L is the gate length. The model has assumed that source,drain, <strong>and</strong> gate have the same depletion width, W c . The value <strong>of</strong> ∆L in (14.3) canbe obtained by using a triangle encompassed by ABC, as shown in Fig. 14.2c.Hence2 2 2c c( ∆ L + r) + W = ( W + r )(14.4)where r is a radius <strong>of</strong> curvature, which describes the lateral <strong>and</strong> vertical depth <strong>of</strong>source <strong>and</strong> drain junctions. Combining the above equations allows Q B to beexpressed as⎧1/2⎪ ⎡⎛2Wc⎞ ⎤ r ⎫⎪QB= qNBWLWc⎨1 − ⎢⎜1 + ⎟ − 1⎥⎬(14.5)⎪⎩⎢⎣⎝r ⎠ ⎥⎦L⎭⎪Equation (14.5) describes the total depletion charge in the channel that isterminated on the gate. It should be noted that the gate length, L, in (14.3) <strong>and</strong>(14.5) is the effective gate length, which has taken into the account the lateraldopant diffusion <strong>of</strong> source <strong>and</strong> drain junctions under the gate. L is less than thephysical gate length, as shown in Fig. 14.1b.One important conclusion resulting from (14.5) is that the threshold voltagedepends not so much on the actual value <strong>of</strong> r, but on the ratio <strong>of</strong> r to the gatelength, L. The requirement that the depth <strong>of</strong> the source <strong>and</strong> drain junctions shouldbe scaled linearly with the gate length is one important rule guiding devicescaling. The physical gate length <strong>of</strong> MOSFET has been reduced from 10 µm in the1970s to a present day size <strong>of</strong> sub-100 nm. Correspondingly, the depths <strong>of</strong> source<strong>and</strong> drain junctions have been reduced from a few microns to sub-100 nm.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!