12.07.2015 Views

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

Ion Implantation and Synthesis of Materials - Studium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172 12 Surface Erosion During <strong>Implantation</strong>: Sputteringon experimental data <strong>of</strong> PtSi sputtering with Ar ions. Setting Y = 4.5 <strong>and</strong> r = 2.0,(12.10) predicts the steady-state surface Pt concentration ratio to be N Pt /N Si =2(4.5 − 1) −1 = 0.57, or a Pt concentration <strong>of</strong> N Pt /(N Si + N Pt ) = 36%.To calculate the Pt dose required to reach this maximum concentration, theparameter R P is estimated to be 29 nm for 45 keV Pt in Si. To reach ~90% <strong>of</strong> thesteady-state concentration, a thickness <strong>of</strong> ~4R P or 116 nm, has to be sputtered.This thickness corresponds to 5.8 × 10 17 atoms cm −2 (based on an atomic density<strong>of</strong> 5.0 × 10 22 cm −3 for Si), which requires a Pt dose <strong>of</strong> 1.3 × 10 17 cm −2 for asputtering yield <strong>of</strong> 4.5.12.6.2 Pt Implanted with 45 keV Si <strong>Ion</strong>sFor Si implanted in Pt, the parameter r is now defined by J Pt /J Si = r N Pt /N Si <strong>and</strong>is approximately 1/2. With Y = 3.0 <strong>and</strong> r = 1/2, (12.10) predicts the maximumsurface Si concentration to be N Si /N Pt = 0.25, or a Si concentration <strong>of</strong> N Si /(N Pt + N Si ) = 20%.To achieve ~90% <strong>of</strong> the maximum Si concentration, a sputter removal <strong>of</strong> athickness <strong>of</strong> 32 nm is required. This thickness corresponds to 2.1 × 10 17atoms cm −2 (based on an atomic density <strong>of</strong> 6.6 × 10 22 cm −3 for Pt), which requiresa Si dose <strong>of</strong> 0.7 × 10 17 cm −2 for a sputtering yield <strong>of</strong> 3.The discussions about the two implantations (1) Pt implanted into Si <strong>and</strong> (2) (Siimplanted into Pt), are summarized in Table 12.1. The sputtering yield <strong>of</strong> Case (1)is higher than that <strong>of</strong> Case (2). However, because <strong>of</strong> the difference in r values,Case (1) can achieve a higher implanted concentration than Case (2). For the samereason, it also takes much more sputtering for Case (1) to reach its maximumconcentration.12.6.3 PtSi Implanted with Si<strong>Implantation</strong> <strong>of</strong> Si into PtSi would be expected to result in a Si-rich Pt–Si mixture.However, instead <strong>of</strong> increasing the Si concentration, the Si implantation may decreaseTable 12.1. Comparison <strong>of</strong> two ion implantations (45 keV)Pt into SiSi into Pisputtering yield Y 4.5 3.0preferential sputtering parameter r 2 1/2maximum implanted concentration 36 at. % 20 at. %implanted layer thickness W 29 nm 32 nmmaterial sputtered to reach ~90% 116 nm 32 nm<strong>of</strong> dose required for max. conc. 1.3 × 10 17 <strong>Ion</strong>s cm −2 0.7 × 10 17 <strong>Ion</strong>s cm −2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!