12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTIONThe purpose of this section is to outline <strong>the</strong> basic assumptions usedin making <strong>the</strong> economic analysis <strong>for</strong> hYdro development in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>­<strong>Copper</strong> Valley area. Evaluation is based exclusively on economic benefitsthat can be derived from hydropower development. Evaluation of <strong>the</strong>Allison Lake development was accomplished by comparing <strong>the</strong> benefits toaccompanying costs. The benefit value of hYdroelectric power is measuredby <strong>the</strong> cost of providing <strong>the</strong> equivalent power from <strong>the</strong> most likelyalternative source (diesel).The base condition of <strong>the</strong> selected plan calls <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> installment of<strong>the</strong> PRT by 1984. The proposed Allison hydro project would <strong>the</strong>n augment<strong>the</strong> system with a power-on-line date of 1990. These projectedinstallment dates are derived from <strong>the</strong> community's future power needs, asposited by <strong>the</strong> Alaska PO\ter Administration's load growth <strong>for</strong>ecast. TheAll i son hYdro component of <strong>the</strong> sel ected pl an is <strong>the</strong> subject of a margi nalanalysis in <strong>the</strong> latter half of this appendix.PROJECT COSTSA detailed cost estimate of <strong>the</strong> selected project is contained inSection D of <strong>the</strong> appendix.Interest During Construction:For <strong>the</strong> purpose of <strong>the</strong> screening analysis, interest duringconstruction was based on <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mula of simple interest (7-3/8 percent)applied to a uni<strong>for</strong>m expenditure over <strong>the</strong> construction period.Annual Costs:The compound interest charge on costs incurred during <strong>the</strong> constructionperiod of any project is considered a logical cost of <strong>the</strong> constructionphase <strong>and</strong> is added to first cost to establish <strong>the</strong> investment cost. Thisinvestment cost can <strong>the</strong>n be trans<strong>for</strong>med into an average annual fixed costby applying <strong>the</strong> appropriate capital recovery factor associated with <strong>the</strong>7-3/8 percent interest rate <strong>and</strong> 100-year economic project life. Byadding operations, maintenance, <strong>and</strong> replacement costs, a total annualcost is establ i shed <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> purpose of determi ni ng comparabil ity <strong>and</strong>feelsi bil i ty.Operation, Maintenance, <strong>and</strong> Replacement Costs (OM&R):Annual or~&R costs were provided by <strong>the</strong> Al aska <strong>Power</strong> Admi ni strati on(APA) <strong>and</strong> a more detailed discussion appears in <strong>the</strong> section on assessment<strong>and</strong> evaluation of detailed plans. An OM&R cost of $200,000 has beenestablished <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Allison Lake project.C-l

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!