12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lntertie:With <strong>the</strong> deciSlon by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Copper</strong> Valley Electric Association toconstruct <strong>the</strong> transmission line between Glennallen <strong>and</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>, <strong>the</strong>opportunity exists to intertie this area with Anchorage-Fairbanks areavia <strong>the</strong> Glenn Highway. This POSsibility was considered under <strong>the</strong> Alaska<strong>Power</strong> Administration's (APA) 1978 Upper Susitna Project <strong>Power</strong> MarketAnalysis. Based on <strong>the</strong> load growth assumptions <strong>and</strong> costs at that time,transmission costs were estimated at 3.3 cents/kWn. However,reevaluation based on 1980 price levels <strong>and</strong> revised load <strong>for</strong>casts showtnat tne cost per kWn nas significantly increased. A more detaileddiscussion of this alternative appears in <strong>the</strong> following section.So 1 i d Wa s t e :<strong>Power</strong> generation from solid waste has severely limited prospects in<strong>the</strong> study area. Typically, successful solid waste operations are locatedin regions of hign population density where economies of scale pennit <strong>the</strong>efficient ga<strong>the</strong>ring, transport, <strong>and</strong> incineration of solid waste. Inaddition, sucn operations playa dual role by relieving populationcenters of solid waste, a less acute consideration <strong>for</strong> smallercommunities. The <strong>Valdez</strong>-Glennallen region does not produce a sufficientvolume of solid waste to enable practicable power generation. This iseviaenced oy similar findings in a recent study made <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Municipalityof Anchorage. Although <strong>the</strong> burning of solid waste on an individual basismay have some substitution potential <strong>for</strong> heating, it is not expected tobe a significant factor during <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>ecast period.Oil Pipeline Turbine:- - - --A pressure reducing turbine (PRT) has been proposed <strong>for</strong> installationin <strong>the</strong> Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline. This turbine would produce electricityby taking advantage of tne nead drop as <strong>the</strong> pipeline descendS TnompsonPass. This project, as originally conceived, would have an installedcdpacity of 9 MW Dased on <strong>the</strong> pipeline design flow of 2 million barrelsper day <strong>and</strong> would produce approximately 63,000 MWH of energy per year.However, tne pipeline is currently pumping at about 1.5 MBD <strong>and</strong> tnere areno plans to increase this in tne future. Based on this output <strong>the</strong> PRTWOUld produce approximately 7.4 MW of power <strong>and</strong> 52,000 MWH per year ofenergy. These figures are based on a plant factor of 0.8.Hydroelectric <strong>Power</strong>:A large number of potential hydroelectric sites are available in <strong>the</strong>study area; however, most have been eliminated due to size, location, orenvironmental proulems.The Stage II report, completed in April 1978, considered sites in <strong>the</strong><strong>Valdez</strong> area only. Sites considered included Gold Creek, Sheep Creek,Wortmann Creek, Silver Lake, Solomon Gulch, Allison Lake, Unnamed Creek,Mineral Creek, <strong>and</strong> Lowe <strong>River</strong>. Of <strong>the</strong>se only Solomon Gulch <strong>and</strong> AllisonCreek demonstrated tentative feasibility.25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!