12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

However,techno10gy has not yet developed enough to consider it as analternative resource in <strong>the</strong>. area be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>the</strong> year 2000.Wind MachinesThis resource only supplements a basic power supply. Energy storagetechnology needs to develop be<strong>for</strong>e wind can serve as primary energy.The Alaska Division of Energy <strong>and</strong> <strong>Power</strong> Development report dated January1979 <strong>and</strong> titled, Alaska's Energy Resources, Phase 1. Volume III hasranked wind power sites in Alaska. Based on sketchy data, out of a listof 67, <strong>Valdez</strong> is number 54 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Glennallen area number 41.Demonstration units (under 100 kW) in Colorado are presently estimateda t over $5, OOO/kW not including installation. Costs will undoubtedlydecrease as <strong>the</strong> technology develops.Overall, <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>/Glennallen area, wind machines cannot be consideredan alternative to Allison Creek. However, <strong>the</strong>y certainly must be investigatedas supplemental power to any future electric supply system.Exogenous SupplyExogenous to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>/Glennallen utility system are several possibilities<strong>for</strong> generation import:1. Rai1be1t interconnection.2. O<strong>the</strong>r large hydroprojects; such as Rampart, Porcupine, Woodchopper.(Wood Canyon <strong>and</strong> Cleve, within <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong> general region,were mentioned under hydropower.)The large hydro projects should not be considered as alternatives<strong>for</strong> this area or any o<strong>the</strong>r area, at this time.The 1979 Susitna power market study included a section on costs of aPalmer-Glennallen transmission line. A $40.8 million investment <strong>and</strong>$3.3 million annual cost result in 3.3~/kWh transmission costs at atransfer of 100 million kWh (1978 costs). 50 million kWh would morenearly fit <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>/Glennallen system; so <strong>the</strong> unit cost would aboutdouble. This would probably be economically feasible. Delivery to CVEAat Glennallen would supply <strong>Valdez</strong> over <strong>the</strong> Glennallen-<strong>Valdez</strong> transmissionline. The Susitna study indicated Railbe1t generation costs averageabout 5~ per KWh to 6~ per KWh at 1978 prices.O<strong>the</strong>r Alternatives1. Pressure Reducing Turbines (PRT's) in <strong>the</strong> A1yeska pipeline.2. A1yeska pipeline terminal generation at <strong>Valdez</strong>.3. ALPETCO petrochemical installation at <strong>Valdez</strong>.26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!