12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Solomon Gulch article in <strong>the</strong> December 1978 issue of Alaska Construction<strong>and</strong> Oil magazine <strong>and</strong> a January 1980 CVEA power cost study both discusspressure reducing turbines in <strong>the</strong> trans-Alaska oil pipeline. A twomillion barrel per day (MBD) oil flow can produce 77,263 MWh with a9.8-MW installed capacity. However, a more likely flow of 1.6 MBD <strong>and</strong> acapacity factor of 80 percent results in 56,000 MWh energy <strong>and</strong> 8 MWcapacity. Investment W0uld be $9.7 million or $1,200/kW. This isdefinitely an alternative to Allison Creek, but requires industry/utilityagreements.A 1974 power cost study <strong>for</strong> <strong>Copper</strong> Valley Electric Association by Robert W.Re<strong>the</strong>r<strong>for</strong>d Associates suggests oil pipeline pressure reducing turbinesin conjunction with hydro pumped storage at Solomon Gulch. This schemeappears quite favorable <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e worth more investigation.The interties to <strong>the</strong> industrial installations at <strong>Valdez</strong> (Alyeska pipelineterminal <strong>and</strong> ALPETCO) conceptually are feasible but considered unlikely.The industries would not have excess firm energy; so <strong>the</strong>se were notincluded as Allison Creek alternatives.27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!