12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

expected to Allison Creek below Allison Lake indicate <strong>the</strong> highest flowsoccur in June, July, <strong>and</strong> August. July <strong>and</strong> August are <strong>the</strong> most criticalmonths because of spawning salmon.Winter withdrawals from <strong>the</strong> lake wOUld be warmer than <strong>the</strong> natural streamtemperatures. Thermograph readings show water temperatures in <strong>the</strong> wintermonths to be near 0° C while lake temperatures are at 3.5 0 C. Sincewinter is <strong>the</strong> high power dem<strong>and</strong> period, <strong>the</strong> project would probably berunning at maximum output part of <strong>the</strong> time. The maximum power releasehas been estimated at approximately 100 CUbic feet per second (cfs) witha predicted streamflow above <strong>the</strong> powerhouse Detween 1 to 5 cfs.Hydroelectric projects tend to even flows. Natural high summer flowswould be utilized to refill <strong>the</strong> lake, <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e reducing outflows from<strong>the</strong> lake. During <strong>the</strong> winter months when natural flows are low, <strong>the</strong> waterused <strong>for</strong> electrical generation would SUbstantially increase <strong>the</strong> flows.The entire stream would be impacted by <strong>the</strong> proposed project with bothsummer <strong>and</strong> winter flows decreased above <strong>the</strong> powerhouse location. Theproposed powerhouse site is located above <strong>the</strong> existing weir,approximately one quarter mile from Port <strong>Valdez</strong>. At this location, <strong>the</strong>water would reenter Allison Creek.Tne natural flUShing process woula be affected by <strong>the</strong> hydroelectricproject, <strong>the</strong>reby reducing streambed scour <strong>and</strong> possibly increasingsedimentation of spawning gravels. Allison Creek has a stable streambed,consisting mainly of boulders <strong>and</strong> slaty cobbles with very small amountsof s<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> gravels. Little fine grain material appears to be entering<strong>the</strong> system, consequently, sedimentation of <strong>the</strong> spawning bedS may notoccur. During high water years, <strong>the</strong> extra quantities of runoff mayprovide adequate flows <strong>for</strong> flUShing. The intertidal area supports <strong>the</strong>majority of spawning activity, <strong>and</strong> tidal fluctuation should keep <strong>the</strong>spawning area free from sedimentation.Winter is <strong>the</strong> tinle of high power consumption <strong>and</strong> also <strong>the</strong> time of lowflows into <strong>the</strong> lake. The increased flows through <strong>the</strong> powerhouse wouldcause <strong>the</strong> lake to De drawn down a maximum of 100 feet from <strong>the</strong> naturalwater 1 eve 1.The tailrace to <strong>the</strong> creeK would consist of a 5-foot diameter steel pipeat a 10 percent slope. The length would be 20 feet with a 10-foottransition to a 2.5-foot diameter steel pipe on <strong>the</strong> sanle slope. Anenergy dissipater Ivould be built on tne banks of <strong>the</strong> creek with very1 itt le instream construct ion. Tne impacts occurring with <strong>the</strong> constructionof <strong>the</strong> dissipater should be minimal; however, in order to assure noimpacts occur on ei<strong>the</strong>r spawning salmon or <strong>the</strong>ir incubating eggs, constructioncould occur between early June <strong>and</strong> mid-July or during <strong>the</strong>winter months when construction could be accomplished out of <strong>the</strong> streambecause of <strong>the</strong> reduction in flow. Approximately 5 cubic yards of riprapwould be placed in <strong>the</strong> creek just below <strong>the</strong> energy dissipater. Tneriprap would be approximately 1.5 feet thick <strong>and</strong> cover about 10 squareyards. The riprap WOUld assure that water from <strong>the</strong> powerhouse would notcause scour or erosion.EIS-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!