12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SYLLABUSThe geographic area considered in this study encompasses <strong>the</strong> coastalcommunity of <strong>Valdez</strong> <strong>and</strong> tne interior communities of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Copper</strong> <strong>River</strong><strong>Basin</strong> (Glennallen being <strong>the</strong> largest). In past years this area has beenimpacted by various economic "booms" <strong>and</strong> "busts." The latest boom was<strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline, followed by <strong>the</strong>post-pipeline construction slump, <strong>the</strong> latest DuSt. During <strong>the</strong>se periods<strong>the</strong>re have been corresponding increases <strong>and</strong> decreases in electrical usage.Although <strong>the</strong> econm~ is currently in a "slump," <strong>the</strong> outlooK <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>future is <strong>for</strong> a large increase in <strong>the</strong> construction industry as <strong>the</strong> AlaskaPetrochemical Company (ALPETCO) begins worK on <strong>the</strong>ir complex in <strong>Valdez</strong>.This, in combination with <strong>the</strong> current expansion of <strong>the</strong> port facilities,will greatly increase electrical dem<strong>and</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, ALPETCOanticipates approximately 720 permanent employees to remain <strong>for</strong> plantoperation. Additional population increases would be associated with <strong>the</strong>employees' families <strong>and</strong> support facilities such as housing, stores, etc.The proposed plan consists of two elements to meet <strong>the</strong> future needs of<strong>the</strong> study area. The elements include <strong>the</strong> installation of a pressurereducing turbine (PRT) in <strong>the</strong> oil pipeline by 1984 followed by hydropowerdevelopment at Allison LaKe approximately 6 years later.The PRT would produce approximately 7.4 megawatts of power based on anoil flow rate of 1.5 million barrels per day. Tnis project has <strong>the</strong>advantage of providing a relatively continuous amount of power year-roundallowing <strong>for</strong> more flexibility in <strong>the</strong> utilization of <strong>the</strong> Solomon Gulch <strong>and</strong>ultimately <strong>the</strong> Allison Lake hydropower systems. Implementation of thisproject would be <strong>the</strong> responsibility of <strong>the</strong> local utility <strong>and</strong> AlyeskaPipeline Service Company.Tne second part of <strong>the</strong> plan, a lake tap at Allison Lake, would produceap~rox;mately 32,200 megawatt hours (MWH) of firm annual energy withS,050 MWH of secondary energy from an installed capacity of 8 megawatts.The estimated first cost is $34,301,000. Associated annual operation,lfIaintenance, <strong>and</strong> replacement costs are estimated at $200,000.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!