12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

turbine. The penstock would bifurcate into two penstocks immediatelyupstream of <strong>the</strong> Alternate No.2 powerhouse valve room. Each penstockwould connect to a turbine. Some of <strong>the</strong> water discharged from <strong>the</strong>turbines would be diverted into <strong>the</strong> existing weir on <strong>the</strong> creek <strong>for</strong>A1yeska's water supply <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department of Fish <strong>and</strong> Game salmonhatchery f ac i 1 it i es.pm~ERPLAN TTwo alternative sites of <strong>the</strong> aboveground powerhouse would be locatednear <strong>the</strong> channel of <strong>the</strong> Allison Creek. The centerline of <strong>the</strong> bifurcationwould be at <strong>the</strong> same elevation as <strong>the</strong> powerp1ant. The powerhouse wouldcontain two synchronous generators driven by Pelton wheel turbines withdesign heads of 1,220 feet <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> alternate Site No.1 <strong>and</strong> 1,170 feet<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> alternate Site No.2. The turbines would have nameplate ratingsof 4.0 MW each. The powerhouse structure would house <strong>the</strong> generators,turbines, a 15-ton bridge crane, <strong>and</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>r equipment required <strong>for</strong>operation <strong>and</strong> maintenance. Remote control of <strong>the</strong> powerp1ant would befrom <strong>Valdez</strong> accomplished through <strong>the</strong> use of a carrier communicationsystem. The tailraces of <strong>the</strong> alternate powerhouse No.2 are longer inlength than that of <strong>the</strong> alternate powerhouse No.1. On both alternatives,stoplogs would be installed near <strong>the</strong> upstream end of <strong>the</strong> tailracepipes to regulate flow during <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>and</strong> winter operations. Energydissipators at <strong>the</strong> Allison Creek end of <strong>the</strong> tailraces would be ofconcrete construction.TRANSMISSION SYSTEMThe <strong>Valdez</strong> project power would be delivered to Solomon Gulch substation<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n transmitted over <strong>the</strong> <strong>Copper</strong> Valley Electric Associationsystem <strong>for</strong> distribution. The transmission line route was located in <strong>the</strong>field based on aerial <strong>and</strong> map reconnaissance. The route runs along <strong>the</strong>south side of <strong>the</strong> existinq road Qetween Allison Creek <strong>and</strong> Solomon Gulch.The terrain is of a moderate ro11inq mountains <strong>and</strong> close to tidewater of<strong>the</strong> Port of <strong>Valdez</strong>.The project installed capacity is 8.0 MW <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmission systemcapacity would be 10 MVA. The transmission line from Allison Creekpowerp1ant to Solomon Gulch sUbstation would be a 115 kV line. Therewould be approximately 3.0 miles of single wood pole construction. Theoverhead conductors would be #1/0 ACSR with no overhead ground wires.The 115 kV system was chosen <strong>for</strong> power transmission to match existingfacilities. Vo1taqe regulation from Allison Creek powerplant to SolomonGulch substation is 2.5 percent <strong>and</strong> is acceptable. An addition to <strong>the</strong>Solomon Gulch sUbstation is proposed to provide switching <strong>and</strong> powerenerqy to <strong>the</strong> existing system. An oil filled circuit breaker would beremotely controlled from <strong>Valdez</strong> via a carrier communication system.The proposed right-of-way would be a 50-foot wide corridor <strong>and</strong> wouldrun over l<strong>and</strong>s administered by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Forest Service. Based on USGSmaps with vegetation overprint, <strong>the</strong> entire line would require essentiallycontinuous clearing. Small shrubs <strong>and</strong> bushes would remain <strong>and</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>rmaterials would be burned, chipped or left in place as determined by <strong>the</strong>D-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!