12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER VFUTURE POWER AND ENERGY ASSUMPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTSEnergy <strong>and</strong> Peak Dem<strong>and</strong> ForecastsAny <strong>for</strong>ecasts in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>/Glennallen area have a high measure ofuncertainty, not only from lack of a stable historic base but also fromvagueness of <strong>the</strong> future. Future contingencies include <strong>the</strong> ALPETCOpetrochemical plant proposal, expansion of <strong>Valdez</strong> port activities, somepetroleum exploration activity near Glennallen, <strong>and</strong> possible electricalinterconnection to <strong>the</strong> Railbelt area.Periodically, <strong>Copper</strong> Valley Electric Association (CVEA), in conjunctionwith <strong>the</strong> Rural Electric Administration (REA), commissions a power requirementsor power cost study. The last one available was datedJanuary 1980 <strong>and</strong> made load estimates <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1980 to 1993 period. Ithas been adapted <strong>for</strong> this study as shown in Table V-I, which listsenergy <strong>and</strong> peak dem<strong>and</strong> by year <strong>for</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>, Glennallen, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> totalCVEA area. Growth rates <strong>and</strong> load factors are also shown.The CVEA <strong>for</strong>ecast does not include <strong>the</strong> proposed ALPETCO petrochemicalfacility near <strong>Valdez</strong> nor adjustment <strong>for</strong> conservation. There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong>estimates have been altered by Alaska <strong>Power</strong> Administration to reflect<strong>the</strong>se contingencies. The <strong>Valdez</strong> <strong>for</strong>ecast was derived by first decreasing<strong>the</strong> CVEA 6-percent.average annual growth rate in five-year increments<strong>the</strong>n adding 17 GWh <strong>for</strong> 1982 peak year construction <strong>and</strong> 12 GWh per year<strong>for</strong> ALPETCO operation. The following average annual growth rates wereapplied to <strong>the</strong> CVEA base 1980 energy:1980-1985 6%1985-1990 5%1995-2000 3%The 17 GWH <strong>and</strong> 12 GWh were developed from <strong>the</strong> 1970 to 1978 net generationper employee statistics <strong>and</strong> estimated numbers of employees. During <strong>the</strong>oil terminal construction in <strong>Valdez</strong>, CVEA supplied 5 to 6 MWh peremployee. The o<strong>the</strong>r years <strong>the</strong>se values were 10 to 14 MWh. The EnvironmentalProtection Agency Environmental Impact Statement of December 1979indicated almost 2,800 peak construction employees <strong>and</strong> about 1,200operational employees. (6 MWh/employees x 2,800 employees = 17 GWh;10 MWh/employees x 1,200 employees = 12 GWh).The Glennallen <strong>for</strong>ecast comes directly from <strong>the</strong> CVEA study. It wasassumed growth factors <strong>and</strong> conservation would cancel any need <strong>for</strong>revision. Peak"loads can be determined by using <strong>the</strong> following loadfactors from <strong>the</strong> CVEA study:Glennallen<strong>Valdez</strong>Total1980-19931993-200057.8%57.1%55.8%57.1%56.7%57.1%17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!