12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cnitc:d Srat6 [)c'~,artmcnt of <strong>the</strong>: I:-::-;::riorF () Bo\ 120\f,c-i't ·r,,!.,!y \1.1\l ... l..~r5HIER-SCo/ 1:51 :'t~e!:lber Lt, 1.980COlO:l~: Lee n. N~...rln~i5t!"ic~ EngineerAlask~ District, Corps of E~~~neersP. G. Box 7002Ancnorage, Alaska 99510~earCelonel Nunn"In response to yoOJr Sep"tembe!" 8, 1980, rectuest 'We flE.,"e reviewed <strong>the</strong> DraftIn"te:-':'!: Feasibility ::tepor:. ar::' Environmental :z::.pac-: ::..a:~ement (r:EIS) <strong>for</strong>Elec~rical <strong>Power</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Copper</strong> <strong>River</strong> Eao~~. We offer <strong>the</strong> followingC-Ol!lDenT..S <strong>for</strong> yOlU' consideration.Gener~lCo~ents1. From our perspective, projec: in<strong>for</strong>mation anG <strong>the</strong> dis~ussion of alterna~ivesin <strong>the</strong> repor"!. <strong>and</strong> DEIS appea:- ~o be gene:-ally aae,:;.u.c.:e. Hoyever, "e believeboth aocumen"!.s are lacking i~ specific info~tio~ related to fisheriesresources <strong>and</strong> vater quality, flows, <strong>and</strong> temperatures. We underst<strong>and</strong> thatadditional studi~s are bein, Flanned as per reconoer.:ations contained in<strong>the</strong> Fish <strong>and</strong> Wildlife Service's May 21, 1980 Fish a~d Wildlife CoordinationAct Report. Upon:. completion of <strong>the</strong>se studies, a SUFplemental CoordinationAct Report ,till be prepared ty <strong>the</strong> Fish a"d Wildlfie Service.1. Refer to response No.1, EPA CommentsSpecific Comments2.FeaSibility Report:Page 32, lmnact Assessment:oil spill be addressed.We suggest that <strong>the</strong> possibility of an3. Page 36, Impact Assess~ent: We believe an assesssment of <strong>the</strong> impactscf Alternative 1 should also be discussed in this section.2. The installation of <strong>the</strong> Pressure Reducing Turbine~robability.of an oil spill because <strong>the</strong> necessaryl~stalled wlth <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong> pipeline.plpeline would be required.3. Text revised. Refer to page 36 of <strong>the</strong> Feasibility Report.should not increase <strong>the</strong>piping <strong>and</strong> valves wereNo alteration of <strong>the</strong>Environmental Impact S~atement:4. Page 9, Hydrology <strong>and</strong> ~ater Quality: We sugges~ that <strong>the</strong> EIS discuss<strong>the</strong> design of features ~d methods <strong>for</strong> providi~g vater release shouldit be necessary to spill excess vater during bigh vater years.4. Text revised. Refer to section D.l.b of <strong>the</strong> FEIS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!