12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nucl ear:Nuclear energy development is not seen as a likely alternative <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>study area. The relatively large size of a nuclear powerplant, <strong>the</strong>prooaoility of a major earthquake in <strong>the</strong> area, <strong>the</strong> growing nationalsentiment against <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> existence of o<strong>the</strong>r viable alternativeshas precluded this alternative from fur<strong>the</strong>r investigation.Natural Gas:Natural gas is not considered a viable alternative <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> studyarea. Although it has oeen used in <strong>the</strong> Anchorage area, <strong>Valdez</strong> <strong>and</strong>Glennallen lacK <strong>the</strong> necessary transportation facilities makingfeasibility dOUbtful. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, national priorities may preclude itsuse <strong>for</strong> electrical energy production on a nationwide level in <strong>the</strong> nearfuture.Oil :The study area currently relies entirely on diesel-fired electricalgeneration. The completion of <strong>the</strong> Solomon Gulch hydroelectric projectwill be <strong>the</strong> first opportunity to break away from <strong>the</strong> grip of escalatingfuel costs. In <strong>Valdez</strong> <strong>and</strong> Glennallen respectively, <strong>the</strong> cost of dieselhas increased from 41.3¢ <strong>and</strong> 44.4¢ per gallon in January 1979 to 79.2¢<strong>and</strong> 84.3¢ per gallon in April 1980. As of Feoruary <strong>1981</strong> <strong>the</strong>se costsstood at $1.00 <strong>for</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong> <strong>and</strong> $1.02 <strong>for</strong> Glennallen. Even with <strong>the</strong>sefactors in mind, diesel generation is still seen as <strong>the</strong> short rangesolution. However, with adequate planning, it will be possible togreatly limit <strong>the</strong> use of diesel fuel. This will be of great benefit to<strong>the</strong> study area as well as fulfilling <strong>the</strong> State <strong>and</strong> Federal policies <strong>for</strong>utilization of renewable resources.Geo<strong>the</strong>rmal:Geo<strong>the</strong>rmal resources could eventually provide significant powergeneration in Alaska. The southcentral railbelt area has sUbstantialgeo<strong>the</strong>rmal potential primarily in <strong>the</strong> Wrangell Mountains; however thisarea has been included in <strong>the</strong> new Wrangell-St. Elias National Park. Dueto this change in l<strong>and</strong> status fur<strong>the</strong>r stUdy of this alternative is notdeemed justified <strong>for</strong> this report.Solar:The radiant heat of <strong>the</strong> sun is ano<strong>the</strong>r renewable source of energy thathas potential <strong>for</strong> generating power. Use of solar energy to produceelectrical power on a large scale is not presently feasible due to <strong>the</strong>lack of technology to generate <strong>and</strong> store large amounts of electricityproduced by <strong>the</strong> sun's radiation. The most successful methods <strong>for</strong>capturing <strong>the</strong> sun's rays have been through active <strong>and</strong> passive solar.heating. However, feasioility <strong>for</strong> heating may be limited in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!