12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. Marketing vagarities (loads, Railbelt intertie, local or stateconstruction) make present comparisons uncertain.Interest rates <strong>for</strong> repayment of Federal investment in power projects arekeyed to long-term borrowing costs, with an annual determination by <strong>the</strong>Secretary of Treasury. The <strong>for</strong>mula is based on average costs of governmentsecurities with 15 or more years to maturity at <strong>the</strong> beginning ofeach fiscal year. Changes in <strong>the</strong> rate to be applied to new investmentsare limited to one-half percent per year.Studies <strong>for</strong> this re.port used an 8 percent interest rate, which was <strong>the</strong>rate to be applied <strong>for</strong> new Federal investment in FY 1980.A larger increase in borrowing costs was experienced in FY 1980, asreflected in Tn~asury' s determination that <strong>the</strong> average rates <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>long-term securities as of October 1, 1980 was in excess of 10 percent(10.25). Thus, if Allison Creek Project is constructed in <strong>the</strong> mid tolate 1980's, it is likely that <strong>the</strong> project interest rate will be 10percent or higher.Under <strong>the</strong> 8 percent assumption <strong>and</strong> October 1980 price levels, annualreserves $3,229,000 are needed to cover operations, maintenance, <strong>and</strong>amortization costs <strong>for</strong> Allison Creek. Under a 10 percent assumption,annual reserve requirements would be $3,937,000, an increase of 22percent. Average rates <strong>for</strong> repayment would reflect similar increases.These figures do not reflect future inflation.Changes in interest rate <strong>and</strong> future inflation would have similar impactson costs <strong>for</strong> alternative power sources.APA concludes that <strong>the</strong> outlook <strong>for</strong> financial feasibility is sufficientlyfavorable to warrant steps towards project authorization, but recommendsreevaluation of <strong>the</strong> power markets <strong>and</strong> alternative costs prior to construction.6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!