12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

These are <strong>the</strong> sites closest by. O<strong>the</strong>r sites could also be consideredbut are judged not alternative to Allison Creek~ If <strong>the</strong> very largeprojects, Wood Canyon or Cleave, are developed <strong>for</strong> energy export elsewhere;feasibility of serving <strong>the</strong> Glennallen-<strong>Valdez</strong> interconnectionshould be considered.Tidal <strong>Power</strong>Tidal power is not considered an 'alternative to Allison Creek. The mainreason is sizing <strong>and</strong> economics. The size needed <strong>for</strong>.tida1project1 feasibility is much too large <strong>for</strong> indigenous use. In qddition, a <strong>Valdez</strong>area tidal project would certainly conflict with port traffic (oiltankers, etc.). If a tidal project is· constructed in <strong>the</strong> Cook Inletarea, it would be considered as exogeneous supply to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>/Glennallenarea by new transmission facilities.Steamp1antsSteam turbines can use many types of resources: coal, oil, gas, nuclear,biomass, sun heat. The availability of each resource, economics, <strong>and</strong>institutional constraints preclude steamp1ants from consideration asalternatives <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>/Glennallen area.Coal-FiredCoal is Scarce in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Valdez</strong>/Glennallen area. One deposit has beendefined in <strong>the</strong> Chugach Mountains, east of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Copper</strong> <strong>River</strong> delta. Noo<strong>the</strong>rs are evidenced. This deposit is ranked low in probability ofdevelopment. A State report of Alaska's resources (see bibliographyreference 13) lists it as ninth out of a dozen possibilities.Several recent report~/ have indicated small size (less than 50 MW)coal-fired steamp1ants cost between $4,000 <strong>and</strong> $5,000 per kW. Thisincludes scrubbers. O<strong>the</strong>r environmental equipment would increase capitalcosts. Adding escalating fuel costs, fuel transportation costs (coalwould have to be imported), <strong>and</strong> high maintenance costs would causesteamp1ant energy to be more expensive than Allison Creek.Oi1- <strong>and</strong> Gas-FiredOil <strong>and</strong> gas provinces in <strong>the</strong> Gulf of Alaska area are evaluated in <strong>the</strong>State study of Alaska's resources (see bibliography item 13). Evaluationsrank an off-shore province as promising, a province surroundingGlennallen as possible, <strong>and</strong> a province east of Cordova as very improbable.In addition to <strong>the</strong> lack of local fuel supplies, oil- <strong>and</strong> gas-firedsteamp1ants are considered as unlikely alternatives to Allison Creekbecause shortages <strong>and</strong> national policy indicate that in a few years <strong>the</strong>sefuels will not be availablp <strong>for</strong> powerplants. In <strong>the</strong> sizes needed <strong>for</strong>generation at ValdeZ/Glennallen, o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>for</strong>ms of energy supply are morepractical <strong>and</strong> economic.1/ 1979 Susitna <strong>Power</strong> Market Study; Alaska Study Committee SouthcentralAlaska Level R Studies.24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!