12.07.2015 Views

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

Electrical Power for Valdez and the Copper River Basin-1981

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

impaired. As a result, st<strong>and</strong>oy generating capacity would almostcertainly have to be maintained at all times. Such st<strong>and</strong>oy capacitywould undouotedly oe provided oy existing diesel generators. Thepercentage of time that this would be necessary cannot be predicted.However, given that no energy source is entirely firm, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong>interest of conservatism, power produced by <strong>the</strong> PRT will be regarded asfirm <strong>and</strong> assigned a dependency factor of 80 percent <strong>for</strong> purposes of thisreport.Ano<strong>the</strong>r concern worthy of fur<strong>the</strong>r consideration is that of projectlife. Estimates of <strong>the</strong> total Prudhoe Bay field are approximately 9.6billion barrels. Based on a flow rate of 1.5 MBD, <strong>the</strong> known oil reserveswill last between 15 <strong>and</strong> 20 years. The potential of additional oildiscoveries, particularly in <strong>the</strong> Beau<strong>for</strong>t Sea, are relatively good;however, due to <strong>the</strong> uncertainty of future finds it will oe assumed that<strong>the</strong> oil will last untn 2000.Pertinent data <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> project follows:Capacity (kW) 7,400 (1.5 MBD)Annual Energy (MWH) 52,000 (PF=0.8)First Cost $9,700,000The above estimates of capacity <strong>and</strong> energy were derived fromin<strong>for</strong>mation available from R.W. Re<strong>the</strong>r<strong>for</strong>d1s 1976 report on <strong>the</strong> pressurereducing turbine. Capacity <strong>and</strong> energy figures were reduced to account<strong>for</strong> an oil flow of 1.5 MBD <strong>and</strong> an 80 percent power availability factor aspreviously stated. The first cost of $9.7 million was obtained from R.W.Re<strong>the</strong>r<strong>for</strong>d Associates who are currently updating <strong>the</strong>ir previous study.The estimated annual costs based on October 1980 prices <strong>and</strong> financingover 16 years at 7-3/8 percent are as follows:Interest <strong>and</strong> AmortizationOperation, Maintenance <strong>and</strong> ReplacementAverage Annual Cost$1,052,000$ 200,000$1,252,000Based on <strong>the</strong>se prices <strong>the</strong> cost per kWh would be approximately 2.4i.The inability of <strong>the</strong> turoine-generator to follow <strong>the</strong> power dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>system would restrict its operation to baseload. This may reduce <strong>the</strong>usaole output until <strong>the</strong> minimum system dem<strong>and</strong> exceeds <strong>the</strong> unit1s capacity.Impact Assessment:The proposed site <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> pressure reducing turbine (PRT) is located 5miles east of <strong>the</strong> pipeline terminal, approximately 3/4 mile off <strong>the</strong>Dayville Road. The PRT site is adjacent to <strong>the</strong> proposed transmissioncorridor on <strong>the</strong> south side of <strong>the</strong> Lowe <strong>River</strong>. The powerhouse <strong>and</strong> parkingfacilities would utilize an area improved during <strong>the</strong> construction of <strong>the</strong>Trans-Alaska Pipeline.33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!