03.12.2012 Views

strategic-management

strategic-management

strategic-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156 KRISTOPHER J. BLANCHARD<br />

EXHIBIT 3 National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Subsidiaries (Amtrak)—continued<br />

Consolidated Balance Sheets<br />

2008 2007 2006 2005<br />

Commitments and Contingencies<br />

Capitalization<br />

Preferred stock $10,939,699.00 $10,939,699.00 $10,939,699.00 $10,939,699.00<br />

Common stock $ 93,857.00 $ 93,857.00 $ 93,857.00 $ 93,857.00<br />

Debt and other paid-in capital $17,415,041.00 $16,100,513.00 $14,829,886.00 $13,559,085.00<br />

Accumulated deficit<br />

Accumulated other comprehensive<br />

-$24,094,909.00 -$22,962,131.00 -$21,819,117.00 -$20,751,127.00<br />

income (loss) -$ 136,359.00 -$ 219,190.00 -$ 1,728.00 -$ 11,454.00<br />

Total Capitalization $ 4,217,329.00 $ 3,952,748.00 $ 4,042,597.00 $ 3,830,060.00<br />

Total Liabilities and Capitalization $10,299,868.00 $10,165,461.00 $ 9,916,287.00 $ 9,747,451.00<br />

The key to Amtrak’s future, in the words from the 2006 Strategic Initiative document,<br />

“hinges first on a defined mission, including adequate and predictable capital funding, and<br />

over the longer term on the emergence of competition and private sector alternatives to<br />

Amtrak.” Specifically, the vision of <strong>management</strong> is to develop an intercity passenger rail<br />

system. To do this, the following objectives will need to be accomplished:<br />

• Development of passenger rail corridors based on a federal-state capital matching<br />

program, with states serving as the developers and purchasers of competitively bid<br />

corridor services<br />

• Return of the Northeast Corridor infrastructure to a state of good repair and operational<br />

reliability, with all users gradually assuming financial responsibility for their<br />

proportionate share of operating and capital needs<br />

• Continuation and possible addition/elimination of certain national long-distance<br />

routes based on established performance thresholds, with a phase-in period to<br />

allow for performance improvements and state participation where needed to meet<br />

thresholds<br />

• Emergence of markets for competition and private commercial participation in all<br />

passenger rail functions and services, including outsourcing of selected functions<br />

and competition among operators for corridor routes<br />

Amtrak’s vision for the coming years is to:<br />

• Deliver superior service—including continued excellence in operational safety<br />

and security and infrastructure/asset <strong>management</strong>—while becoming more market<br />

and customer oriented<br />

• Serve as a catalyst for change—helping the nation’s intercity passenger rail system<br />

achieve the long-term objectives from above<br />

• Evolve into one of a number of competitors for passenger rail services and routes,<br />

all positioned on equal competitive footing<br />

Competitors<br />

Amtrak has many competitors because they are in the business of transportation. A primary<br />

competition that Amtrak faces is the automobile. Automobiles provide consumers with<br />

more flexibility and generally are a faster form of transportation. The main difference is that<br />

consumers must own a car and provide their own transportation. Beyond the automobile,<br />

the main competition comes from Greyhound Bus Lines and airlines.<br />

GREYHOUND Although the time required to travel using Greyhound is very similar to<br />

that of Amtrak, passengers are likely to spend less when traveling by bus. The difference is<br />

that the accommodations on the train tend to be more comfortable than those on the bus.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!