03.12.2012 Views

strategic-management

strategic-management

strategic-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

226 PART 3 • STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION<br />

FIGURE 7-4<br />

Adhesive<br />

Packaging<br />

Division<br />

Tubes/<br />

Cores<br />

Division<br />

The huge computer firm Dell Inc., reorganized in 2009 into two SBUs. One SBU is<br />

Consumer Products and the other is Commercial. As part of its reorganization, Dell<br />

deleted the geographic divisions within its Consumer Products segment. However within<br />

its Commercial segment, there are now three worldwide units: (1) large enterprise, (2) public<br />

sector, and (3) small and midsize businesses. Dell is also closing a manufacturing facility<br />

in Austin, Texas, and laying off more employees as the company struggles to compete.<br />

Computer prices and demand are falling as competition increases. Atlantic Richfield<br />

Fairchild Industries, and Honeywell International are examples of firms that successfully<br />

use an SBU-type structure.<br />

As illustrated in Figure 7-4, Sonoco Products Corporation, based in Hartsville, South<br />

Carolina, utilizes an SBU organizational structure. Note that Sonoco’s SBUs—Industrial<br />

Products and Consumer Products—each have four autonomous divisions that have their<br />

own sales, manufacturing, R&D, finance, HRM, and MIS functions.<br />

The Matrix Structure<br />

A matrix structure is the most complex of all designs because it depends upon both vertical<br />

and horizontal flows of authority and communication (hence the term matrix). In contrast,<br />

functional and divisional structures depend primarily on vertical flows of authority<br />

and communication. A matrix structure can result in higher overhead because it creates<br />

more <strong>management</strong> positions. Other disadvantages of a matrix structure that contribute to<br />

overall complexity include dual lines of budget authority (a violation of the unity-of-command<br />

principle), dual sources of reward and punishment, shared authority, dual reporting<br />

channels, and a need for an extensive and effective communication system.<br />

Despite its complexity, the matrix structure is widely used in many industries, including<br />

construction, health care, research, and defense. As indicated in Table 7-9, some<br />

advantages of a matrix structure are that project objectives are clear, there are many channels<br />

of communication, workers can see the visible results of their work, and shutting<br />

down a project can be accomplished relatively easily. Another advantage of a matrix structure<br />

is that it facilitates the use of specialized personnel, equipment, and facilities.<br />

Functional resources are shared in a matrix structure, rather than duplicated as in a divisional<br />

structure. Individuals with a high degree of expertise can divide their time as needed<br />

among projects, and they in turn develop their own skills and competencies more than in<br />

other structures. Walt Disney Corp. relies on a matrix structure.<br />

Sonoco Products’ SBU Organizational Chart<br />

Chief<br />

Strategy<br />

Officer (CSO)<br />

Chief<br />

Finance<br />

Officer (CFO)<br />

Paper<br />

Division<br />

Chief Executive Officer<br />

Chief<br />

Operating<br />

Officer (COO)<br />

Reels<br />

Division<br />

Chief<br />

Information<br />

Officer (CIO)<br />

Flexible<br />

Packaging<br />

Division<br />

VP of<br />

Human<br />

Resources<br />

High<br />

Density Film<br />

Division<br />

VP of<br />

Marketing<br />

Industrial Products SBU Consumer Products SBU<br />

Metal<br />

Ends<br />

Division<br />

Rigid<br />

Division

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!