06.09.2021 Views

Becoming America - An Exploration of American Literature from Precolonial to Post-Revolution, 2018a

Becoming America - An Exploration of American Literature from Precolonial to Post-Revolution, 2018a

Becoming America - An Exploration of American Literature from Precolonial to Post-Revolution, 2018a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BECOMING AMERICA<br />

PRE- AND EARLY COLONIAL LITERATURE<br />

this life, after death will go <strong>to</strong> another place, where their condition will be directly<br />

contrary <strong>to</strong> the rst; where they will never enjoy peace and contentment, as the<br />

good will do. But I have never been able rightly <strong>to</strong> discover whether they believe the<br />

soul will be hereafter united <strong>to</strong> the body. I have, however, spoken with Christians<br />

who remark, that they have heard them state such <strong>to</strong> be their belief. But they do<br />

not arm <strong>to</strong> this fact. When they hear voices or noises in the woods at night, which<br />

frequently happens, and which, we believe, usually proceed <strong>from</strong> wild animals, but<br />

which they declare, with fear and as<strong>to</strong>nishment, are made by the wicked, the souls<br />

<strong>of</strong> whom are thus doomed <strong>to</strong> wander at night in the woods and solitary palaces for<br />

punishment in unhappy situations. The Indians, because they fear those subjects,<br />

do not travel by night unless it be necessary, and then go in parties or companies;<br />

when they go alone they always carry a re-brand with them, with which they<br />

believe they can keep o those evil spirits and prevent them <strong>from</strong> doing them any<br />

injury, which, they say, are always disposed <strong>to</strong> frighten them and do them wrong.<br />

They acknowledge also that the soul proceeds <strong>from</strong> God, and that the same is<br />

his gift. This we sometimes learn <strong>from</strong> their old men <strong>of</strong> understanding, when an<br />

opportunity presents itself in conversation and we probably would discover more<br />

<strong>of</strong> them in relation <strong>to</strong> this matter, if we did perfectly understand their languages.<br />

Among their common or young people we do not hear those spoken <strong>of</strong>. In this we<br />

still see the providence <strong>of</strong> God, who, by the common light <strong>of</strong> nature, has given <strong>to</strong><br />

this people the knowledge that there is, after this life, a reward for the just, and a<br />

punishment for the unjust, which all mankind may expect.<br />

1.9.2 Reading and Review Questions<br />

1. How, why, and <strong>to</strong> what eect does van der Donck assert the right <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Dutch <strong>to</strong> possess New Netherland? What assumptions about law and<br />

jurisdiction does he make, and why?<br />

2. What details <strong>of</strong> Dutch culture can be inferred by van der Donck’s<br />

description <strong>of</strong> the land, crops, and people in New Netherland? How does<br />

van der Donck’s description in this way dier <strong>from</strong> that <strong>of</strong> other New<br />

World accounts?<br />

3. Van der Donck records details <strong>of</strong> <strong>America</strong>n Indian lives and culture <strong>to</strong><br />

prevent regret over their inevitable disappearance. According <strong>to</strong> van der<br />

Donck, who will feel this regret? Why?<br />

4. Why did the Dutch “name” <strong>America</strong>n Indians the “wilden?” How does<br />

van der Donck justify this name as appropriate, even as he acknowledges<br />

that dierent tribes and groups exist, each with their own distinct name?<br />

5. Van der Donck recounts an <strong>America</strong>n Indian noting how the Christian<br />

God allows himself <strong>to</strong> be burnt (when a Christian altar and relics catch<br />

re and burn). Van der Donck declares that the <strong>America</strong>n Indian mocked<br />

the Christian God. Why does van der Donck recount this event and this<br />

so-called mockery? What do you think is van der Donck’s point?<br />

Page | 94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!