06.09.2021 Views

Becoming America - An Exploration of American Literature from Precolonial to Post-Revolution, 2018a

Becoming America - An Exploration of American Literature from Precolonial to Post-Revolution, 2018a

Becoming America - An Exploration of American Literature from Precolonial to Post-Revolution, 2018a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BECOMING AMERICA<br />

REVOLUTIONARY AND EARLY NATIONAL PERIOD LITERATURE<br />

Finding him <strong>to</strong> have a repulsive and jealous nature, Fanny Fern <strong>to</strong>ok the remarkable<br />

step <strong>of</strong> leaving her husband, leading <strong>to</strong> a somewhat scandalous divorce in 1857,<br />

and then turning <strong>to</strong> writing as a pr<strong>of</strong>ession by which <strong>to</strong> earn her living.<br />

Her writing focused on issues <strong>of</strong> immediate concern <strong>to</strong> herself as a woman, such<br />

as domesticity, women ‘s rights, the double standard, and prostitution. Her searing,<br />

logical, clear-eyed, and humorous satirical pieces won her a large readership, even<br />

as her irony and mockery debunked gender stereotypes. Her children ‘s book Little<br />

Ferns for Fanny ‘s Little Friends (1853) sold 100,000 copies. She followed this<br />

success with the au<strong>to</strong>biographical novel Ruth Hall: A Domestic Tale <strong>of</strong> the Present<br />

Time (1854), a work criticizing the prevailing ideology <strong>of</strong> separate spheres that<br />

relegated women <strong>to</strong> the private sphere. Through this criticism, she made a strong<br />

case for women ‘s right <strong>to</strong> earn their living through work in the public sphere.<br />

Fanny Fern exemplied the ability <strong>of</strong> women <strong>to</strong> earn their living and so gain<br />

au<strong>to</strong>nomy and comparative freedom. She became the highest paid columnist in<br />

<strong>America</strong> with her Fanny Fern ‘s Column. She also wrote best-selling books and<br />

bought herself a Manhattan browns<strong>to</strong>ne, where she lived with her third husband,<br />

James Par<strong>to</strong>n, until she died <strong>of</strong> cancer in 1872.<br />

4.19.1 “Male Criticism on Ladies’ Books”<br />

(1857)<br />

Courtship and marriage, servants and children, these are the great objects <strong>of</strong> a<br />

woman ‘s thoughts, and they necessarily form the staple <strong>to</strong>pics <strong>of</strong> their writings<br />

and their conversation. We have no right <strong>to</strong> expect anything else in a woman ‘s<br />

book.—N.Y. Times.<br />

Is it in feminine novels only that courtship, marriage, servants, and children are<br />

the staple? Is not this true <strong>of</strong> all novels?—<strong>of</strong> Dickens, <strong>of</strong> Thackeray, <strong>of</strong> Bulwer and<br />

a host <strong>of</strong> others? Is it peculiar <strong>to</strong> feminine pens, most astute and liberal <strong>of</strong> critics?<br />

Would a novel be a novel if it did not treat <strong>of</strong> courtship and marriage? and if it could<br />

be so recognized, would it nd readers? When I see such a narrow, snarling criticism<br />

as the above, I always say <strong>to</strong> myself, the writer is some unhappy man, who has come<br />

up without the rening inuence <strong>of</strong> mother, or sister, or reputable female friends;<br />

who has divided his migra<strong>to</strong>ry life between boarding-houses, restaurants, and the<br />

outskirts <strong>of</strong> edi<strong>to</strong>rial sanctums; and who knows as much about reviewing a woman<br />

‘s book, as I do about navigating a ship, or engineering an omnibus <strong>from</strong> the South<br />

Ferry, through Broadway, <strong>to</strong> Union Park. I think I see him writing that paragraph<br />

in a t <strong>of</strong> spleen—<strong>of</strong> male spleen—in his small boarding-house upper chamber, by<br />

the cheerful light <strong>of</strong> a solitary candle, ickering alternately on cobwebbed walls,<br />

dusty wash-stand, begrimed bowl and pitcher, refuse cigar stumps, boot-jacks, old<br />

hats, but<strong>to</strong>nless coats, muddy trousers, and all the wretched accompaniments <strong>of</strong><br />

solitary, selsh male existence, not <strong>to</strong> speak <strong>of</strong> his own puckered, unkissable face;<br />

Page | 1146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!