17.01.2013 Views

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />

cross-industry perspectives and expertise – because industry<br />

boundaries will be shaped by customer needs rather than by<br />

core competencies.<br />

5.15 Managing i-<strong>business</strong><br />

106<br />

In the end, of course, strategy is only as good as its execution.<br />

New economic <strong>strategies</strong> will need to be translated into changes<br />

related not only to technology but also to processes and people.<br />

This will mean executing a complex, global change programme<br />

– on a large scale.<br />

Management of such systems is significantly more complex than<br />

managing IT within individual <strong>organizations</strong>. In order to put in<br />

place an IOS, the cost of communications and the cost of the<br />

technology needed must be justifiable to all parties, while any<br />

implementation must first deal with congruence with longrange<br />

strategic planning. While this may already be in place<br />

within an organization, the <strong>for</strong>mation of alliances or partnerships<br />

may serve to require a radical rethink in terms of the<br />

revised landscape of opportunities and strengths.<br />

Against this background, a shared approach to conflict management<br />

may need to be <strong>for</strong>malized, as existing implicit procedures<br />

may not suffice. It can be readily appreciated that the means of<br />

resolving a conflict in a company founded, owned and run by a<br />

single dynamic individual will be far distant from those<br />

employed by a publicly owned multinational with partially<br />

independent subsidiaries. Within a single language group or<br />

country, many <strong>business</strong> models may exist: with increased<br />

interest in <strong>for</strong>ming transnational or global alliances, such issues<br />

assume high importance and call <strong>for</strong> considered investigation<br />

and resolution lest unstated different assumptions wreck collaboration<br />

unnecessarily.<br />

Against this, organizational issues need to be plotted: partners<br />

may not have the same resources to throw at a project, they may<br />

have widely different views on the appropriate levels of<br />

responsibility within their <strong>for</strong>ms and unstated beliefs in the<br />

<strong>business</strong> and social value of technology will affect implementation.<br />

Added on to these issues are those relating to the<br />

technology to be deployed within any IOS. Any discussion of<br />

standards, equipment, networks and the like will quickly throw<br />

up the fact that technology is not neutral. What is taken <strong>for</strong><br />

granted in one company – a perceived value of a networking<br />

technology, or adherence to proprietary standards – may be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!