[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
cross-industry perspectives and expertise – because industry<br />
boundaries will be shaped by customer needs rather than by<br />
core competencies.<br />
5.15 Managing i-<strong>business</strong><br />
106<br />
In the end, of course, strategy is only as good as its execution.<br />
New economic <strong>strategies</strong> will need to be translated into changes<br />
related not only to technology but also to processes and people.<br />
This will mean executing a complex, global change programme<br />
– on a large scale.<br />
Management of such systems is significantly more complex than<br />
managing IT within individual <strong>organizations</strong>. In order to put in<br />
place an IOS, the cost of communications and the cost of the<br />
technology needed must be justifiable to all parties, while any<br />
implementation must first deal with congruence with longrange<br />
strategic planning. While this may already be in place<br />
within an organization, the <strong>for</strong>mation of alliances or partnerships<br />
may serve to require a radical rethink in terms of the<br />
revised landscape of opportunities and strengths.<br />
Against this background, a shared approach to conflict management<br />
may need to be <strong>for</strong>malized, as existing implicit procedures<br />
may not suffice. It can be readily appreciated that the means of<br />
resolving a conflict in a company founded, owned and run by a<br />
single dynamic individual will be far distant from those<br />
employed by a publicly owned multinational with partially<br />
independent subsidiaries. Within a single language group or<br />
country, many <strong>business</strong> models may exist: with increased<br />
interest in <strong>for</strong>ming transnational or global alliances, such issues<br />
assume high importance and call <strong>for</strong> considered investigation<br />
and resolution lest unstated different assumptions wreck collaboration<br />
unnecessarily.<br />
Against this, organizational issues need to be plotted: partners<br />
may not have the same resources to throw at a project, they may<br />
have widely different views on the appropriate levels of<br />
responsibility within their <strong>for</strong>ms and unstated beliefs in the<br />
<strong>business</strong> and social value of technology will affect implementation.<br />
Added on to these issues are those relating to the<br />
technology to be deployed within any IOS. Any discussion of<br />
standards, equipment, networks and the like will quickly throw<br />
up the fact that technology is not neutral. What is taken <strong>for</strong><br />
granted in one company – a perceived value of a networking<br />
technology, or adherence to proprietary standards – may be