[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
are, and they are industry specific and not yet fully apparent.<br />
For example, it will become apparent that e-<strong>business</strong> enables<br />
and requires new product capabilities and new services. This<br />
opens opportunities <strong>for</strong> those already in <strong>business</strong>, but equally<br />
opens the way <strong>for</strong> new entrants. The positions of current players<br />
are threatened, especially those who act as intermediaries.<br />
As a result we see a trend <strong>for</strong> e-<strong>business</strong> to bring producers<br />
closer to the consumer, leading to the reduced need <strong>for</strong><br />
intermediaries (wholesalers, distributors and the like). This<br />
trend toward disintermediation has been observed in the<br />
financial markets and is being followed by developments in the<br />
insurance and travel industry. Does this mean less employment?<br />
Probably not, but it does imply that different <strong>for</strong>ms of<br />
employment will prevail.<br />
On the other hand, we may also observe the opposite trend in<br />
action at the same time. There is a process of reintermediation<br />
occurring as e-<strong>business</strong> creates the possibility of new and<br />
different <strong>for</strong>ms of intermediary – the bookseller Amazon.com<br />
being the world’s largest and best known example. These very<br />
different opportunities and threats cannot be evaluated through<br />
simple cost – benefit analysis tools and present a significant<br />
challenge <strong>for</strong> investment and risk analysis.<br />
8.4 Return on investment and risk analysis<br />
172<br />
Some EC initiatives could be strong revenue generators but<br />
may not create new markets; others may create new markets<br />
but will not return a significant profit. Some may create a<br />
competitive advantage in the short term but lose this on the<br />
emergence of a new competitive initiative in e-<strong>business</strong>.<br />
Resources required to create additional value through<br />
e-<strong>business</strong> need to be examined with respect to their likely<br />
return on investment in order to develop a compelling <strong>business</strong><br />
case. This is not so simple as it sounds, however.<br />
Traditional measures such as discounted cash flow (DCF) and<br />
net present value (NPV) do not take into account the values of<br />
benefits such as knowledge of customer needs. Calculating any<br />
rate of return on investment (ROI) from e-<strong>business</strong> cases<br />
requires an assessment of increased revenue as well as<br />
decreased costs; customer value variables, stakeholder value<br />
variables and competitive capability variables. One approach<br />
suggested by Parker (1996) and referred to as in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
economics attempts to address some of these issues by classifying<br />
values and risks as (a) values: financial, strategic and