17.01.2013 Views

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />

164<br />

� the problem of managing IT/IS personnel with a different<br />

culture from the mainstream activities;<br />

� the difficulty <strong>for</strong> managers to accurately <strong>for</strong>ecast and control<br />

costs in areas with which they are not familiar; and<br />

� the fluctuating demand <strong>for</strong> IT/IS services internally.<br />

In addition, the difficulty of attracting, training, and retaining IS<br />

staff all have a part to play in this.<br />

Having recognized these very real factors, we must still be<br />

aware that <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> outsourcing need to be very closely<br />

aligned to the overall knowledge management strategy and not<br />

based solely on cost reduction. For many enterprises, some<br />

adoption of <strong>virtual</strong> organizational <strong>for</strong>m may offer a solution to<br />

be tested in this area. Virtual <strong>organizations</strong> offer a way to source<br />

the best knowledge resource through <strong>virtual</strong> alliances without<br />

the addition of further management layers <strong>for</strong> coordination and<br />

control. In order <strong>for</strong> this to work effectively, however, the<br />

recognition of what is happening must be clearly stated and<br />

recognized as an integral part of the <strong>virtual</strong> strategy and it must<br />

achieve the strategic intent. This intent must be recognized and<br />

expressed as a goal of IT/IS improvement (most common),<br />

<strong>business</strong> improvement or commercial exploitation. A failure to<br />

set out clear reasons <strong>for</strong> policy is to throw away any chance of<br />

measuring its success.<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance and value measurement has to move away from<br />

static measures such as market share when new markets with<br />

very different rules and games are being developed on a regular<br />

basis. It is well known that Amazon.com cannot be measured<br />

against traditional market values since it has yet to record<br />

traditional profits and is not pursuing a policy of doing so in the<br />

short term. New approaches such as economic value added<br />

(EVA), market value added (MVA), and benchmarking give<br />

much wider definitions of value and need to be incorporated into<br />

the organization’s portfolio management. An analysis of industrial<br />

and <strong>business</strong> wealth creation today might well be based on<br />

the role of intangible assets and dynamic capabilities.<br />

There is also one further issue to be added to the above list – in<br />

our opinion. We maintain it is of critical importance to any<br />

knowledge management strategy, and that is how to look after and<br />

manage the people on whom the organization depends. We encourage<br />

you to think in terms of what the social structures, attitudes and<br />

reward mechanisms are – or that should be in place – to move<br />

toward effective knowledge management and create a real<br />

knowledge-based culture in the organization.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!