[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
Figure 4.2<br />
Achieving strategic<br />
alignment (adapted from<br />
Henderson and<br />
Venkatraman 1994)<br />
62<br />
strategy, and finally an IT strategy, but acknowledging the<br />
constraints and pressures in the real world which may act to<br />
limit the <strong>strategies</strong> somewhat. Given the rate of technological<br />
change, and the potential and impact that modern IT could have<br />
directly on <strong>business</strong> strategy, at the outset of this process it was<br />
important to be aware of technological advances that may<br />
impact or alter the chosen or desired course <strong>for</strong> an organization<br />
(Peppard 1993, Liedtka 1998). Issues of strategic alignment<br />
between the <strong>business</strong> and IS/IT came under increased scrutiny,<br />
with frameworks developed to help alignment or ‘fit’. Figure 4.2<br />
is a typical example.<br />
<strong>business</strong> scope<br />
distinctive competencies<br />
<strong>business</strong> governance<br />
administrative infrastructure<br />
processes<br />
skills and capabilities<br />
Internal <strong>business</strong> environment Internal IT environment<br />
Business<br />
strategy<br />
Organizational<br />
infrastructure<br />
and processes<br />
IS/IT<br />
strategy<br />
IS/IT<br />
infrastructure<br />
and processes<br />
technology scope<br />
IT competencies<br />
IT governance<br />
technology architecture<br />
processes<br />
skills and capabilities<br />
For parsimony in subsequent discussions, the <strong>business</strong> components<br />
will jointly be described as the internal <strong>business</strong> environment,<br />
and similarly, the IT components as the internal IT<br />
environment.<br />
In Figure 4.3, there is an example of one of the frameworks that<br />
was developed <strong>for</strong> SISP during the 1990s. Essentially, this<br />
framework underpins directly an approach to SISP articulated<br />
by Ward and Griffiths (1996). However, it is asserted that its<br />
general nature suggests that most modern SISP methods would<br />
employ a variety of (albeit different) tools and techniques to<br />
accomplish exactly what this framework encapsulates. In simple<br />
and succinct terms, this SISP framework suggests the following<br />
assumptions:<br />
� That a <strong>business</strong> plan, setting the general future direction <strong>for</strong><br />
an enterprise, is an important source of input to the SISP ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />
(or is, at least, concurrently developed with the IS plan).<br />
� That the SISP should consider the external <strong>business</strong> environment<br />
of the organization. The external <strong>business</strong> environment<br />
provides an assessment of a range of <strong>for</strong>ces (competitive,<br />
economic, social and political, <strong>for</strong> example) impacting on the<br />
organization, thus encouraging debate on specifically how IS/