17.01.2013 Views

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />

Figure 4.2<br />

Achieving strategic<br />

alignment (adapted from<br />

Henderson and<br />

Venkatraman 1994)<br />

62<br />

strategy, and finally an IT strategy, but acknowledging the<br />

constraints and pressures in the real world which may act to<br />

limit the <strong>strategies</strong> somewhat. Given the rate of technological<br />

change, and the potential and impact that modern IT could have<br />

directly on <strong>business</strong> strategy, at the outset of this process it was<br />

important to be aware of technological advances that may<br />

impact or alter the chosen or desired course <strong>for</strong> an organization<br />

(Peppard 1993, Liedtka 1998). Issues of strategic alignment<br />

between the <strong>business</strong> and IS/IT came under increased scrutiny,<br />

with frameworks developed to help alignment or ‘fit’. Figure 4.2<br />

is a typical example.<br />

<strong>business</strong> scope<br />

distinctive competencies<br />

<strong>business</strong> governance<br />

administrative infrastructure<br />

processes<br />

skills and capabilities<br />

Internal <strong>business</strong> environment Internal IT environment<br />

Business<br />

strategy<br />

Organizational<br />

infrastructure<br />

and processes<br />

IS/IT<br />

strategy<br />

IS/IT<br />

infrastructure<br />

and processes<br />

technology scope<br />

IT competencies<br />

IT governance<br />

technology architecture<br />

processes<br />

skills and capabilities<br />

For parsimony in subsequent discussions, the <strong>business</strong> components<br />

will jointly be described as the internal <strong>business</strong> environment,<br />

and similarly, the IT components as the internal IT<br />

environment.<br />

In Figure 4.3, there is an example of one of the frameworks that<br />

was developed <strong>for</strong> SISP during the 1990s. Essentially, this<br />

framework underpins directly an approach to SISP articulated<br />

by Ward and Griffiths (1996). However, it is asserted that its<br />

general nature suggests that most modern SISP methods would<br />

employ a variety of (albeit different) tools and techniques to<br />

accomplish exactly what this framework encapsulates. In simple<br />

and succinct terms, this SISP framework suggests the following<br />

assumptions:<br />

� That a <strong>business</strong> plan, setting the general future direction <strong>for</strong><br />

an enterprise, is an important source of input to the SISP ef<strong>for</strong>t<br />

(or is, at least, concurrently developed with the IS plan).<br />

� That the SISP should consider the external <strong>business</strong> environment<br />

of the organization. The external <strong>business</strong> environment<br />

provides an assessment of a range of <strong>for</strong>ces (competitive,<br />

economic, social and political, <strong>for</strong> example) impacting on the<br />

organization, thus encouraging debate on specifically how IS/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!