17.01.2013 Views

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IS planning <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> emerging <strong>business</strong> models<br />

keep firms lean and drive innovation. That emphasis has been<br />

challenged across the board today as the notion of coopetition<br />

gains currency. Cooperation with suppliers, customers and<br />

firms producing complementary or related products can lead to<br />

expansion of the market and the <strong>for</strong>mation of new <strong>business</strong><br />

relationships, perhaps even the creation of new <strong>for</strong>ms of<br />

enterprise.<br />

In place of seeking to compete within the market, taking as<br />

much customer base and profit as possible, regardless of the<br />

interests of other companies, and seeking to drive competitors<br />

out of <strong>business</strong>, coopetition seems a gentler, if more difficult,<br />

game. Some people see <strong>business</strong> entirely as competition. They<br />

think doing <strong>business</strong> is waging war and assume they can’t win<br />

unless somebody else loses. Other people see <strong>business</strong> entirely<br />

as cooperative teams and partnerships. But <strong>business</strong> is both<br />

cooperation and competition. It’s coopetition.<br />

Coopetition often involves companies agreeing not to battle in<br />

one market even as they fight like dogs in others: witness the<br />

current ‘grand alliance’ of Sun, IBM, Apple, and Netscape,<br />

which is supporting the open programming language Java to<br />

undermine Microsoft’s market power. More commonly, companies<br />

will compete on actual products even as they cooperate<br />

on technical standards, sacrificing a degree of independence to<br />

increase the odds of success <strong>for</strong> the technology as a whole. Look<br />

at the huge success of American Airlines in opening its Sabre<br />

reservation system to competing carriers.<br />

The concept, and the word, seem to have been taken up most<br />

enthusiastically in the computer industry, where strategic<br />

alliances have long been common in order to develop new<br />

products and markets, particularly between software and<br />

hardware firms. Another motivator <strong>for</strong> the computer industry is<br />

that its consumers want to know in advance that a broad range<br />

of companies will support a given technology. Companies<br />

cooperating helps such markets grow faster, without waiting a<br />

long time to dump competing technologies. It also helps focus<br />

scarce resources – though not necessarily on what is ultimately<br />

the best technology.<br />

Needless to say, coopetition makes regulatory authorities<br />

nervous. There is an old-fashioned word <strong>for</strong> competitors who<br />

agree not to compete – cartel, with its overtones of price fixing.<br />

Today’s regulators say that they appreciate the theoretical<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!