[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IS planning <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> emerging <strong>business</strong> models<br />
keep firms lean and drive innovation. That emphasis has been<br />
challenged across the board today as the notion of coopetition<br />
gains currency. Cooperation with suppliers, customers and<br />
firms producing complementary or related products can lead to<br />
expansion of the market and the <strong>for</strong>mation of new <strong>business</strong><br />
relationships, perhaps even the creation of new <strong>for</strong>ms of<br />
enterprise.<br />
In place of seeking to compete within the market, taking as<br />
much customer base and profit as possible, regardless of the<br />
interests of other companies, and seeking to drive competitors<br />
out of <strong>business</strong>, coopetition seems a gentler, if more difficult,<br />
game. Some people see <strong>business</strong> entirely as competition. They<br />
think doing <strong>business</strong> is waging war and assume they can’t win<br />
unless somebody else loses. Other people see <strong>business</strong> entirely<br />
as cooperative teams and partnerships. But <strong>business</strong> is both<br />
cooperation and competition. It’s coopetition.<br />
Coopetition often involves companies agreeing not to battle in<br />
one market even as they fight like dogs in others: witness the<br />
current ‘grand alliance’ of Sun, IBM, Apple, and Netscape,<br />
which is supporting the open programming language Java to<br />
undermine Microsoft’s market power. More commonly, companies<br />
will compete on actual products even as they cooperate<br />
on technical standards, sacrificing a degree of independence to<br />
increase the odds of success <strong>for</strong> the technology as a whole. Look<br />
at the huge success of American Airlines in opening its Sabre<br />
reservation system to competing carriers.<br />
The concept, and the word, seem to have been taken up most<br />
enthusiastically in the computer industry, where strategic<br />
alliances have long been common in order to develop new<br />
products and markets, particularly between software and<br />
hardware firms. Another motivator <strong>for</strong> the computer industry is<br />
that its consumers want to know in advance that a broad range<br />
of companies will support a given technology. Companies<br />
cooperating helps such markets grow faster, without waiting a<br />
long time to dump competing technologies. It also helps focus<br />
scarce resources – though not necessarily on what is ultimately<br />
the best technology.<br />
Needless to say, coopetition makes regulatory authorities<br />
nervous. There is an old-fashioned word <strong>for</strong> competitors who<br />
agree not to compete – cartel, with its overtones of price fixing.<br />
Today’s regulators say that they appreciate the theoretical<br />
73