[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.8 Conclusion<br />
IS planning <strong>strategies</strong> <strong>for</strong> emerging <strong>business</strong> models<br />
Note that there are parallel changes to the outputs of the SISP.<br />
Arguably an emergent strategy <strong>for</strong> the strategic <strong>business</strong><br />
network will be articulated, detailing the in<strong>for</strong>mation, IS, and<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation management required to support and enable the<br />
activities of the strategic <strong>business</strong> network into the future<br />
(whatever that is perceived to be).<br />
Also considered in the SBN IS strategy are concerns regarding IT<br />
human resource requirements and change management <strong>strategies</strong>.<br />
This strategic <strong>business</strong> network IS strategy will likewise<br />
impact the respective internal IS <strong>strategies</strong> of A, B, and C, and<br />
will be shaped and limited by those internal IS <strong>strategies</strong>. An IT<br />
strategy <strong>for</strong> the strategic <strong>business</strong> network will also likewise be<br />
derived.<br />
The framework articulated above stems from concerns that<br />
existing frameworks to support SISP in modern <strong>business</strong>es are<br />
inadequate given the changing nature of contemporary <strong>business</strong><br />
environments and the emergence of strategic networks and the<br />
like. SISP in its broadest sense – encompassing not only<br />
<strong>for</strong>malized planning processes but also including everyday<br />
thinking and reflection on the role and deployment of IS/IT in<br />
an organization’s <strong>business</strong> activities – is still argued to be an<br />
important organizational activity. The conceptual perspective<br />
spelt out here is an early attempt to start moving existing<br />
frameworks <strong>for</strong> SISP <strong>for</strong>ward to embrace new organizational<br />
realities.<br />
However this framework may be tempered by a number of<br />
different factors. For example, the relative size and power of the<br />
collaborating partners may be significant. Also, this framework<br />
has not been designed <strong>for</strong> a star-alliance model (see Chapter 3)<br />
of collaboration, in which one central player has the power, size<br />
and dominance to dictate courses of action and requirements to<br />
other collaborating partners. The strategic <strong>business</strong> network<br />
referred to here is much closer to the notion of a market alliance<br />
or value chain alliance (see Chapter 3) or where no player is in<br />
the position, or has the predisposition, to dominate the others.<br />
Thus considerations of the leadership of the SISP <strong>for</strong> the<br />
strategic <strong>business</strong> network must be given. Is leadership required<br />
that is external to the network (perhaps in the <strong>for</strong>m of an<br />
independent consultancy), or can a team drawn from the senior<br />
ranks across collaborating enterprises be created that provides<br />
75