[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
14<br />
� Virtual means resembling or giving the appearance of a wellknown<br />
physical item or object, which in fact it is not. It<br />
normally implies that the <strong>virtual</strong> object so described is<br />
supported by in<strong>for</strong>mation and communication technology<br />
(ICT). This sub-concept of <strong>virtual</strong> means that something is<br />
only created by data. In this sense we talk readily of <strong>virtual</strong><br />
shopping malls – in this case we are using the model of the<br />
physical shopping mall to describe a grouping of enterprises<br />
which appear to be in proximity and to <strong>for</strong>m a cluster while in<br />
fact they need have no physical locations in common. In this<br />
sense we commonly talk of these <strong>virtual</strong> objects as having an<br />
existence in cyberspace.<br />
� Virtual means ‘potentially present’. This sub-concept of<br />
<strong>virtual</strong> is often used to describe resource pools. The resource<br />
pool is basically a repository of resources; as soon as the need<br />
<strong>for</strong> a certain resource configuration is allocated, an operating<br />
unit will be <strong>for</strong>med. This simply means that the resource pool<br />
has the potential to be real when it is needed. The ‘<strong>virtual</strong><br />
Web’ is a good example of this sub-concept.<br />
� Virtual means ‘existing, but changing’. This sub-concept<br />
describes the fluid and dynamic network approach. This kind<br />
of organization reconfigures itself permanently; it is dynamic,<br />
progressive and only temporary. ‘Virtual corporations’ and<br />
‘<strong>virtual</strong> teams’ are good examples of this sub-concept. While it<br />
is accepted that <strong>business</strong> conglomerates may buy and sell<br />
subsidiaries, thus changing their components over time, we<br />
do not think of them as <strong>virtual</strong> because of this. However, the<br />
very speed with which an organization may reconfigure itself<br />
and its components using modern in<strong>for</strong>mation and communication<br />
technologies (ICTs) does tempt us to see this as a new<br />
organizational <strong>for</strong>m, not simply a faster-moving old <strong>for</strong>m.<br />
1.7.1 A taxonomy of the <strong>virtual</strong><br />
Figure 1.4 is introduced as a handy way of seeing how various<br />
ideas of <strong>virtual</strong> can be related.<br />
Figure 1.4 shows how we may think of <strong>virtual</strong> organization from<br />
both an intraorganizational and interorganizational perspective.<br />
The interorganizational perspective is divided into <strong>virtual</strong><br />
markets and <strong>virtual</strong> corporations. Virtual markets means<br />
e-commerce, market transactions between companies using<br />
sophisticated ICT, i.e. the Internet. In contrast, <strong>virtual</strong> corporations<br />
are basically partnership networks of dispersed organizational<br />
units or independent companies.