17.01.2013 Views

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />

68<br />

Various methods, tools and techniques used to guide SISP<br />

processes involved members of an organization scanning their<br />

external <strong>business</strong> environment (<strong>for</strong> opportunities and threats),<br />

in developing an understanding of their customers’ needs and<br />

values (with the view to developing systems to provide real<br />

benefits to customers), to considering their <strong>business</strong> <strong>strategies</strong><br />

(with a view to using IT to help achieve desired objectives and<br />

goals), and so on. Thus, SISP activity acknowledged the external<br />

<strong>business</strong> and IT environment and hence became more outward<br />

looking, without too much consideration of the potential of<br />

various characteristics of the <strong>virtual</strong> organization (flexible,<br />

temporary structures, heavy reliance on outsourcing of various<br />

functions and activities, and interorganizational <strong>business</strong> processes,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example) to make fundamental changes to the IS<br />

requirements of a network of associated <strong>organizations</strong>.<br />

In practice, some consultants sought involvement of external<br />

stakeholders in the SISP process, but again this seems to have<br />

been geared to ensure that the <strong>business</strong> strategy and IT<br />

initiatives of the organization were indeed targeted towards<br />

value adding <strong>for</strong> these various stakeholder groups. To understand<br />

why this is a significant shortcoming, we turn now to an<br />

introduction to interorganizational systems.<br />

4.5.1 Interorganizational activity<br />

There has been no real sense in which SISP has been viewed or<br />

presented as an interorganizational activity, where SISP is taking<br />

place simultaneously in a number of <strong>organizations</strong> whose<br />

operations have become highly interdependent and interconnected.<br />

There seems to be a distinct sense in which SISP<br />

cannot sensibly be undertaken in one part of the ‘organism’ or<br />

‘ecosystem’ (Moore 1996) without also being conducted in other<br />

parts of the organism at much the same time. Admittedly some<br />

‘big’ players still use market dominance to stretch their systems<br />

outwards into other, smaller players in an industry, simply<br />

through en<strong>for</strong>cing their adoption and compliance, but electronic<br />

commerce networks and marketplaces of interconnected small<br />

and medium enterprises imply that these might be the exception<br />

rather than the norm. Figure 4.5 is an attempt to represent this<br />

notion.<br />

If the model of the <strong>virtual</strong> organization, the agile organization,<br />

or the strategic <strong>business</strong> network becomes more prevalent, then<br />

there are important ramifications <strong>for</strong> SISP. Notions of organizational<br />

boundaries blur, implying that notions of corporate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!