[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
68<br />
Various methods, tools and techniques used to guide SISP<br />
processes involved members of an organization scanning their<br />
external <strong>business</strong> environment (<strong>for</strong> opportunities and threats),<br />
in developing an understanding of their customers’ needs and<br />
values (with the view to developing systems to provide real<br />
benefits to customers), to considering their <strong>business</strong> <strong>strategies</strong><br />
(with a view to using IT to help achieve desired objectives and<br />
goals), and so on. Thus, SISP activity acknowledged the external<br />
<strong>business</strong> and IT environment and hence became more outward<br />
looking, without too much consideration of the potential of<br />
various characteristics of the <strong>virtual</strong> organization (flexible,<br />
temporary structures, heavy reliance on outsourcing of various<br />
functions and activities, and interorganizational <strong>business</strong> processes,<br />
<strong>for</strong> example) to make fundamental changes to the IS<br />
requirements of a network of associated <strong>organizations</strong>.<br />
In practice, some consultants sought involvement of external<br />
stakeholders in the SISP process, but again this seems to have<br />
been geared to ensure that the <strong>business</strong> strategy and IT<br />
initiatives of the organization were indeed targeted towards<br />
value adding <strong>for</strong> these various stakeholder groups. To understand<br />
why this is a significant shortcoming, we turn now to an<br />
introduction to interorganizational systems.<br />
4.5.1 Interorganizational activity<br />
There has been no real sense in which SISP has been viewed or<br />
presented as an interorganizational activity, where SISP is taking<br />
place simultaneously in a number of <strong>organizations</strong> whose<br />
operations have become highly interdependent and interconnected.<br />
There seems to be a distinct sense in which SISP<br />
cannot sensibly be undertaken in one part of the ‘organism’ or<br />
‘ecosystem’ (Moore 1996) without also being conducted in other<br />
parts of the organism at much the same time. Admittedly some<br />
‘big’ players still use market dominance to stretch their systems<br />
outwards into other, smaller players in an industry, simply<br />
through en<strong>for</strong>cing their adoption and compliance, but electronic<br />
commerce networks and marketplaces of interconnected small<br />
and medium enterprises imply that these might be the exception<br />
rather than the norm. Figure 4.5 is an attempt to represent this<br />
notion.<br />
If the model of the <strong>virtual</strong> organization, the agile organization,<br />
or the strategic <strong>business</strong> network becomes more prevalent, then<br />
there are important ramifications <strong>for</strong> SISP. Notions of organizational<br />
boundaries blur, implying that notions of corporate