17.01.2013 Views

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />

202<br />

expect to supply from within. (For a great deal of insight on this<br />

see the work of Ronald Coase and his successors on transaction<br />

theory.)<br />

At this stage, two-thirds of the way through this text if you are<br />

reading sequentially, we should pause to reflect that while the<br />

first half of the last century showed us that the most effective<br />

<strong>for</strong>m of <strong>business</strong> enterprise was the hierarchical structure which<br />

subsumed suppliers and competitors horizontally and vertically<br />

as the (transaction cost-based) chance arose. During this time<br />

economies of scale were venerated, and in many cases realized,<br />

as firms organized into bureaucratic silos of divisions or<br />

functions. In<strong>for</strong>mation naturally flowed, like water, along the<br />

easiest paths – in this case determined by divisions and lines of<br />

authority. The coordination of power and responsibility was a<br />

central function of the apex of the pyramid, power being<br />

distributed from the centre in the <strong>for</strong>m of resources.<br />

By the 1980s it had become clear that enormous economic and<br />

social pressures had already effected great change to the<br />

previous beliefs about organizational structure and efficiency.<br />

Market convergence, the internationalization of competition and<br />

the advent of innovative in<strong>for</strong>mation and communication<br />

technologies came together to produce restless marketplaces in<br />

which short-term shifts could easily destroy long-term survival.<br />

As well as strategy, firms were <strong>for</strong>ced to rethink both structure<br />

and strategy to respond dynamically to change. The past<br />

hierarchies proved insufficiently responsive, and dynamic networks<br />

of <strong>organizations</strong>, or within <strong>organizations</strong> proved their<br />

worth. It is recognition of this that led to the positing of<br />

networks as novel, and the tired notion of the necessity of stage<br />

growth that has led to the PriceWaterhouse and Tapscott models<br />

introduced above.<br />

Similarly it is the retention of thinking in terms of central<br />

authority and control that necessitates thinking in outsourcing<br />

terms. We have introduced these here <strong>for</strong> you, but caution<br />

reliance on these when they are failing to demonstrate their<br />

relevance in the e-<strong>business</strong> environment we are facing.<br />

It is our contention that this text as a whole will encourage you<br />

to see emerging <strong>business</strong> <strong>for</strong>ms as taking advantage of new<br />

technologies and increasingly adopt network postures. At the<br />

same time, middle management function will be less to worry<br />

about making in-house or outsourcing, but to replace internal<br />

administration task with the roles of in<strong>for</strong>mation integrator and<br />

entrepreneur.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!