[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
202<br />
expect to supply from within. (For a great deal of insight on this<br />
see the work of Ronald Coase and his successors on transaction<br />
theory.)<br />
At this stage, two-thirds of the way through this text if you are<br />
reading sequentially, we should pause to reflect that while the<br />
first half of the last century showed us that the most effective<br />
<strong>for</strong>m of <strong>business</strong> enterprise was the hierarchical structure which<br />
subsumed suppliers and competitors horizontally and vertically<br />
as the (transaction cost-based) chance arose. During this time<br />
economies of scale were venerated, and in many cases realized,<br />
as firms organized into bureaucratic silos of divisions or<br />
functions. In<strong>for</strong>mation naturally flowed, like water, along the<br />
easiest paths – in this case determined by divisions and lines of<br />
authority. The coordination of power and responsibility was a<br />
central function of the apex of the pyramid, power being<br />
distributed from the centre in the <strong>for</strong>m of resources.<br />
By the 1980s it had become clear that enormous economic and<br />
social pressures had already effected great change to the<br />
previous beliefs about organizational structure and efficiency.<br />
Market convergence, the internationalization of competition and<br />
the advent of innovative in<strong>for</strong>mation and communication<br />
technologies came together to produce restless marketplaces in<br />
which short-term shifts could easily destroy long-term survival.<br />
As well as strategy, firms were <strong>for</strong>ced to rethink both structure<br />
and strategy to respond dynamically to change. The past<br />
hierarchies proved insufficiently responsive, and dynamic networks<br />
of <strong>organizations</strong>, or within <strong>organizations</strong> proved their<br />
worth. It is recognition of this that led to the positing of<br />
networks as novel, and the tired notion of the necessity of stage<br />
growth that has led to the PriceWaterhouse and Tapscott models<br />
introduced above.<br />
Similarly it is the retention of thinking in terms of central<br />
authority and control that necessitates thinking in outsourcing<br />
terms. We have introduced these here <strong>for</strong> you, but caution<br />
reliance on these when they are failing to demonstrate their<br />
relevance in the e-<strong>business</strong> environment we are facing.<br />
It is our contention that this text as a whole will encourage you<br />
to see emerging <strong>business</strong> <strong>for</strong>ms as taking advantage of new<br />
technologies and increasingly adopt network postures. At the<br />
same time, middle management function will be less to worry<br />
about making in-house or outsourcing, but to replace internal<br />
administration task with the roles of in<strong>for</strong>mation integrator and<br />
entrepreneur.