[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
1.6 Technology as enabling <strong>virtual</strong><br />
<strong>organizations</strong><br />
12<br />
If we accept the notions of the new economy and/or the Internet<br />
economy, we expect that these constructs will have implications<br />
in the nature and operations of enterprises within the new<br />
economy. As the transaction cost of locating, evaluating, and<br />
interacting with other <strong>organizations</strong> drops dramatically in price<br />
(in terms of both money and time) in the new economy, we<br />
could expect to see the boundaries of an organization becoming<br />
more fluid as the distinction between work done within an<br />
organization and work prepared or processed outside, but <strong>for</strong>,<br />
the organization becomes clearer. We are seeing, it is argued, the<br />
emergence of boundary-spanning networks as a characteristic of<br />
our age in the same way as the industrial revolution gave rise to<br />
distinctive organizational <strong>for</strong>ms around 200 years ago. Today’s<br />
strategic challenge of doing more with less has led firms to look<br />
outward as well as inward <strong>for</strong> solutions to improve their ability<br />
to compete without adding internal resources. Viewed through<br />
this lens, we may identify three strategic options <strong>for</strong> firms to<br />
cope with increasingly competitive markets. Firms can either<br />
pool their resources with others, <strong>for</strong>m alliances to exploit market<br />
opportunities, or link their organizational systems in partnerships.<br />
The value of going <strong>virtual</strong> is often espoused in the<br />
management literature but there is as yet little empirical<br />
research to show that value and <strong>virtual</strong>ity are directly related.<br />
Indeed, there are so many fuzzy concepts related to <strong>virtual</strong>ity<br />
that any broad statement made with regard to <strong>virtual</strong> <strong>organizations</strong><br />
must be regarded with suspicion. It could be argued that<br />
there is a degree of <strong>virtual</strong>ity in all <strong>organizations</strong> but at what<br />
point does this present a conflict between control and adaptability?<br />
Is there a continuum along which <strong>organizations</strong> can position<br />
themselves in the electronic marketplace according to their<br />
needs <strong>for</strong> flexibility and fast responsiveness as opposed to<br />
stability and sustained momentum?<br />
While there may be general agreement with regard to the<br />
advantages of flexibility the extent to which <strong>virtual</strong>ity offers<br />
flexibility and the advantages that this will bring to a corporation<br />
have yet to be measured. There is an assumption that an<br />
organization that invests in as little infrastructure as possible<br />
will be more responsive to a changing marketplace and more<br />
likely to attain global competitive advantage but this ignores the<br />
very real power which large integrated <strong>organizations</strong> can bring<br />
to the market in terms of sustained innovation over the longer