17.01.2013 Views

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />

1.6 Technology as enabling <strong>virtual</strong><br />

<strong>organizations</strong><br />

12<br />

If we accept the notions of the new economy and/or the Internet<br />

economy, we expect that these constructs will have implications<br />

in the nature and operations of enterprises within the new<br />

economy. As the transaction cost of locating, evaluating, and<br />

interacting with other <strong>organizations</strong> drops dramatically in price<br />

(in terms of both money and time) in the new economy, we<br />

could expect to see the boundaries of an organization becoming<br />

more fluid as the distinction between work done within an<br />

organization and work prepared or processed outside, but <strong>for</strong>,<br />

the organization becomes clearer. We are seeing, it is argued, the<br />

emergence of boundary-spanning networks as a characteristic of<br />

our age in the same way as the industrial revolution gave rise to<br />

distinctive organizational <strong>for</strong>ms around 200 years ago. Today’s<br />

strategic challenge of doing more with less has led firms to look<br />

outward as well as inward <strong>for</strong> solutions to improve their ability<br />

to compete without adding internal resources. Viewed through<br />

this lens, we may identify three strategic options <strong>for</strong> firms to<br />

cope with increasingly competitive markets. Firms can either<br />

pool their resources with others, <strong>for</strong>m alliances to exploit market<br />

opportunities, or link their organizational systems in partnerships.<br />

The value of going <strong>virtual</strong> is often espoused in the<br />

management literature but there is as yet little empirical<br />

research to show that value and <strong>virtual</strong>ity are directly related.<br />

Indeed, there are so many fuzzy concepts related to <strong>virtual</strong>ity<br />

that any broad statement made with regard to <strong>virtual</strong> <strong>organizations</strong><br />

must be regarded with suspicion. It could be argued that<br />

there is a degree of <strong>virtual</strong>ity in all <strong>organizations</strong> but at what<br />

point does this present a conflict between control and adaptability?<br />

Is there a continuum along which <strong>organizations</strong> can position<br />

themselves in the electronic marketplace according to their<br />

needs <strong>for</strong> flexibility and fast responsiveness as opposed to<br />

stability and sustained momentum?<br />

While there may be general agreement with regard to the<br />

advantages of flexibility the extent to which <strong>virtual</strong>ity offers<br />

flexibility and the advantages that this will bring to a corporation<br />

have yet to be measured. There is an assumption that an<br />

organization that invests in as little infrastructure as possible<br />

will be more responsive to a changing marketplace and more<br />

likely to attain global competitive advantage but this ignores the<br />

very real power which large integrated <strong>organizations</strong> can bring<br />

to the market in terms of sustained innovation over the longer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!