[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
70<br />
number of levels. With pressures across government generally<br />
to maintain or enhance services to the public while decreasing<br />
costs, any prospect of efficiency gains through collaboration is<br />
attractive. Important also is the recognition of potential<br />
improvements to service per<strong>for</strong>mance in all three agencies if all<br />
three worked collaboratively. The actions and responsibilities of<br />
all three departments are somewhat mandated by law, and prior<br />
to the decision to work more closely on aspects of their<br />
responsibilities, contacts between the departments had been<br />
minimal in terms of the issues of interest.<br />
A, B, and C each bring to the relationship not only a set of<br />
complementary skills, assets and competencies, but also three<br />
discrete internal <strong>business</strong> environments, including notions such<br />
as visions, goals and objectives, decision-making styles and<br />
processes, patterns of communication and interaction, <strong>business</strong><br />
processes and approaches to ‘doing <strong>business</strong>’, corporate cultures,<br />
learning styles, attitudes to risk and planning, and so on.<br />
As A, B, and C strive to work together at some level <strong>for</strong> some<br />
purpose, as they strive to reconcile different objectives and<br />
approaches, they individually bring internal <strong>business</strong> environments<br />
to their collaboration from which over time evolves a<br />
network <strong>business</strong> environment.<br />
Participating in the collaboration, however, and hence becoming<br />
part of the network <strong>business</strong> environment, is likely to cause<br />
changes to the individual internal <strong>business</strong> environments. Each<br />
individual organization’s interaction with the external <strong>business</strong><br />
environment is thus now mediated through the network<br />
<strong>business</strong> environment, at least as far as the extent of their<br />
collaboration is concerned.<br />
Take, <strong>for</strong> example, the issue of domestic violence. A, B, and C<br />
individually have a set of <strong>strategies</strong>, competencies, structures,<br />
processes, procedures and infrastructure by which they individually<br />
address their responsibilities in terms of domestic violence.<br />
As they collaborate and start to share and explore one<br />
another’s perspectives on the issue, realizations of new possibilities<br />
occur, and the recognition of joint initiatives, shared<br />
resources, new cooperative procedures, etc. emerge. So too does<br />
the recognition that changes to individual internal <strong>business</strong><br />
environments to ‘give’ to the network <strong>business</strong> environment<br />
will take place.<br />
Each individual member of the alliance experiences the creation<br />
of network <strong>business</strong> environment, and changes to the internal<br />
<strong>business</strong> environment. This process repeats and evolves over