17.01.2013 Views

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />

70<br />

number of levels. With pressures across government generally<br />

to maintain or enhance services to the public while decreasing<br />

costs, any prospect of efficiency gains through collaboration is<br />

attractive. Important also is the recognition of potential<br />

improvements to service per<strong>for</strong>mance in all three agencies if all<br />

three worked collaboratively. The actions and responsibilities of<br />

all three departments are somewhat mandated by law, and prior<br />

to the decision to work more closely on aspects of their<br />

responsibilities, contacts between the departments had been<br />

minimal in terms of the issues of interest.<br />

A, B, and C each bring to the relationship not only a set of<br />

complementary skills, assets and competencies, but also three<br />

discrete internal <strong>business</strong> environments, including notions such<br />

as visions, goals and objectives, decision-making styles and<br />

processes, patterns of communication and interaction, <strong>business</strong><br />

processes and approaches to ‘doing <strong>business</strong>’, corporate cultures,<br />

learning styles, attitudes to risk and planning, and so on.<br />

As A, B, and C strive to work together at some level <strong>for</strong> some<br />

purpose, as they strive to reconcile different objectives and<br />

approaches, they individually bring internal <strong>business</strong> environments<br />

to their collaboration from which over time evolves a<br />

network <strong>business</strong> environment.<br />

Participating in the collaboration, however, and hence becoming<br />

part of the network <strong>business</strong> environment, is likely to cause<br />

changes to the individual internal <strong>business</strong> environments. Each<br />

individual organization’s interaction with the external <strong>business</strong><br />

environment is thus now mediated through the network<br />

<strong>business</strong> environment, at least as far as the extent of their<br />

collaboration is concerned.<br />

Take, <strong>for</strong> example, the issue of domestic violence. A, B, and C<br />

individually have a set of <strong>strategies</strong>, competencies, structures,<br />

processes, procedures and infrastructure by which they individually<br />

address their responsibilities in terms of domestic violence.<br />

As they collaborate and start to share and explore one<br />

another’s perspectives on the issue, realizations of new possibilities<br />

occur, and the recognition of joint initiatives, shared<br />

resources, new cooperative procedures, etc. emerge. So too does<br />

the recognition that changes to individual internal <strong>business</strong><br />

environments to ‘give’ to the network <strong>business</strong> environment<br />

will take place.<br />

Each individual member of the alliance experiences the creation<br />

of network <strong>business</strong> environment, and changes to the internal<br />

<strong>business</strong> environment. This process repeats and evolves over

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!