[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
[8] 2002 e-business-strategies-for-virtual-organizations
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
e-Business Strategies <strong>for</strong> Virtual Organizations<br />
236<br />
conversation. They show how the rise of the Internet has<br />
enabled people to restart conversations in a global world. The<br />
basic message of this book is that the balance of power is rapidly<br />
moving away from giant impersonal corporations and shifting<br />
toward well-in<strong>for</strong>med and articulate consumers. One of the<br />
main reasons behind the increase in power of the consumer is<br />
the fact that the Internet provides a means whereby they can<br />
group together into powerful <strong>virtual</strong> communities. One of the<br />
messages in this book is that the large suppliers who try to<br />
ignore this change will do so at their own peril.<br />
One could argue that the balance of power, at least on the<br />
Internet, moved away from the giant corporations to articulate,<br />
well-in<strong>for</strong>med and above all, well-connected consumers several<br />
years ago. This argument is supported by the 1994 Pentium<br />
fiasco. In June 1994 Intel engineers discovered a division error in<br />
their new Pentium chip. Intel managers decided not in<strong>for</strong>m<br />
anyone outside the company on the grounds that the division<br />
error could only affect a very few customers. On 24 October Dr<br />
T.R. Nicely, a math professor in Virginia (who double-checked<br />
all his work by computing everything twice, on two different<br />
computers), detected the error and contacted Intel technical<br />
support to report the error. Intel did not get back to Dr Nicely<br />
and so on 30 October Dr Nicely e-mailed a few people to in<strong>for</strong>m<br />
them of the bug he had discovered. On 3 November Terje<br />
Mathisen of Norsk Hydro posted a message entitled ‘Glaring<br />
FDIV Bug in Pentium’ on the Internet newsgroup comp.sys.intel.<br />
By 24 November the story had been reported by the New<br />
York Times, more than 200 other newspapers as well as on the<br />
radio and TV news networks.<br />
At this stage Intel made an offer to replace a Pentium processor<br />
only after Intel had determined that the processor would cause<br />
a problem in the application in which it would be used.<br />
On 12 December IBM issued a press release announcing that it<br />
had halted shipments of Pentium-based PCs and Intel stock had<br />
dropped by $3.25 that week.<br />
By 20 December Intel finally agreed to replace all flawed<br />
Pentiums upon request. Intel had to set aside a reserve of $475<br />
million to cover costs of the Pentium recall.<br />
On 18 January 1995 the Wall Street Journal (cited in Hoovers-<br />
Online 1994) reported that Intel’s flawed Pentium chips resulted<br />
in their profit falling 37% in the fourth quarter of 1994.