Health, Wellness and Tourism: healthy tourists, healthy business ...

Table 2 – Learning Commitment Analysis
Commitment Mean Standard
Deviation
1. Regular practicing time 3.6389 0.6566
2. Practice time and frequency 3.7083 0.5919
3. Level of seriousness 3.8750 0.5551
Health Benefit Analysis
Student’s health benefit analysis is shown in Table 3. It showed that promote health was the
highest, next were enhance immunity and delay aging and then release stress. This
demonstrated the importance of preventing aging. From visitors’ health benefit item KMO
analysis, its value was 0.720, and Sphericity test Chi-Square value was 148.033, both reached
significant level. Two factors were extracted from health benefit items, and the accumulated
explained variance was 65.807%. Factor included enhance immunity, delay aging, promote
health and release stress, therefore, it is named as health. Its explained value of 42.767% and
reliability analysis Cronbach α value is 0.7849. Factor 2 included sense of accomplishment
and body shaping, and because beauty is related with confidence, this factor was named
confidence, and its explained value is 23.040% and reliability analysis Cronbach α value is
0.670.
Table 3 – Health Benefit Analysis
Dimension Health Benefit Mean Standard Factor
Deviation Loading
Health Enhance
Immunity
4.4167 0.7268 .875
Delay Aging 4.4028 0.8164 .859
Promote Health 4.5278 0.5300 .690
Release Stress 4.3333 0.6500 .597
Confidence Sense of
Accomplishment
3.7639 0.7598 .953
Body Shaping 4.1528 0.8164 .608
Eigenvalue Explained
Variance
2.566 42.767
1.382 23.040
The relationship of satisfaction, leisure involvement, and health benefit
The special interest tourism model of this study regarding the relationship of satisfaction,
leisure involvement, and health benefit is shown in Figure 2 by using Lisrel 8.5. The numbers
represent path coefficient, and the ones in parentheses represent T value of path coefficient.
From figure 2, it is learned that model basic goodness-of-fit test all reached significant level
besides health product of satisfaction dimension, and T value of all the dimensions were
larger then 1.645 with no negative deficiency variances and all deficiency variances reached
significant level, which showed the basic good goodness-of-fit of this model is good. As for
model goodness-of-fit, χ 2 value is 1.14, RMSEA=0.042, NFI=0.82, NNFI= 0.93, GFI=0.92,
AGFI=0.85, PGFI=0.52, PNFI=0.57, RMR=0.065, CFI=0.95, IFI=0.96, which showed the
good goodness-of-fit of this model is good.
Based on figure 2, the influence coefficient of satisfaction toward leisure involvement is 0.27,
t value is 1.65 and both reached significant level, which indicated satisfaction has positive
significant effect over leisure involvement, and when satisfaction is higher, leisure
involvement is higher; therefore, hypothesis H1 stands. The influence coefficient of
satisfaction toward health benefit is 0.66, t value is 2.98 and both reached significant level,
which indicated satisfaction has positive significant effect over health benefit, and when