02.04.2013 Views

TEUTONIC MYTHOLOGY. - Centrostudirpinia.it

TEUTONIC MYTHOLOGY. - Centrostudirpinia.it

TEUTONIC MYTHOLOGY. - Centrostudirpinia.it

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER II.<br />

GOD.<br />

In all Teutonic tongues the Supreme Being has always w<strong>it</strong>h<br />

one consent been called by the general name God. The dialectic<br />

varieties are : Goth, guff, A.S., O.S., 0. Fris. god, O.H.G. cot, 0.<br />

Norse goff ; Swed. Dan. gud, M.H.G. got, M.L.G. god ; and here<br />

there is a grammatical remark to make. Though all the dialects,<br />

even the Norse, use the word as masculine (hence in O.H.G. the ace.<br />

sing, cotan ; I do not know of a M.H.G. goten), yet<br />

in Gothic and<br />

0. Norse <strong>it</strong> lacks the nom. sing, termination (-s, -r) of a masc. noun,<br />

and the Gothic gen. sing, is formed guffs w<strong>it</strong>hout the connectingvowel<br />

i, agreeing therein w<strong>it</strong>h the three irreg. gen<strong>it</strong>ives mans,<br />

fadrs, broSrs. Now, as O.H.G. has the same three gen<strong>it</strong>ives irreg.,<br />

man, fatar, pruodar, we should have expected the gen. cot to bear<br />

them company, and I do not doubt <strong>it</strong>s having existed, though I<br />

have nowhere met w<strong>it</strong>h <strong>it</strong>, only w<strong>it</strong>h the reg. cotes, as indeed<br />

mannes and fateres also occur. It is more likely that the sanct<strong>it</strong>y<br />

of the name had preserved the oldest form inviolate, than that fre<br />

quent use had worn <strong>it</strong> down. 1 The same reason preserved the<br />

O.H.G. spelling cot (Gramm. 1, 180), the M. Dut. god (1, 486), and<br />

Moreover, God and<br />

perhaps the Lat. vocative deus (1, 1071). 2<br />

other names of divine beings reject every article (4, 383. 394. 404.<br />

424. 432) ; they are too firmly established as proper nouns to<br />

need any such distinction. The der got in MS. 2, 260a. is said of a<br />

heathen de<strong>it</strong>y.<br />

On the radical meaning of the word God we have not yet<br />

arrived at certainty ;<br />

3 <strong>it</strong> is not immediately connected w<strong>it</strong>h the adj.<br />

1 The drift of these remarks seems to be this : The<br />

word, though used as a<br />

masc., has a neut. form is this an ; archaism, pointing to a time when the<br />

word was really neuter or a mere ; irregular<strong>it</strong>y due to abtr<strong>it</strong>ion, the word<br />

having always been masc. ? TRANS.<br />

2 Saxo does not inflect Thor Uhland ; p. 198.<br />

3 The Slav, bogh is connected w<strong>it</strong>h the Sanskr. bhaga felic<strong>it</strong>as, bhakta<br />

devotus, and bhaj colere ; perhaps also w<strong>it</strong>h the obscure bahts in the Goth,<br />

andbahts minister, cultor conf. ; p. 20, note on boghat, dives. Of 6e6s, deus<br />

we shall have to speak in ch. IX.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!